Heinrich Vogeler – Karelia and Murmansk
1926. 125x90
Location: Old and New National Galleries, Museum Berggruen (Alte und Neue Nationalgalerie, Museum Berggruen), Berlin.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A prominent feature is a large, stylized red star, centrally positioned and partially obscuring the view of the landscape behind it. This emblem immediately signals an ideological context, suggesting themes of revolution or socialist ideals. Radiating from this central point are triangular forms in varying shades of red, which act as visual dividers and guide the viewer’s eye through the scene.
The lower portion of the painting depicts a group of figures engaged in what appears to be labor – possibly construction or resource extraction. They are rendered with simplified features and a sense of collective purpose, reinforcing the theme of communal effort. A railway line cuts diagonally across this area, symbolizing progress, connectivity, and perhaps industrialization.
Above the working figures, the landscape expands into a more idyllic vista. Here we see settlements nestled amongst trees and waterways. The artist has included architectural elements that suggest a blend of traditional and modern construction. A bridge spans a body of water, connecting disparate parts of the depicted territory. This structure can be interpreted as representing unification or overcoming geographical barriers.
Inscriptions are integrated into the composition, appearing on banners and within the triangular red forms. These texts, though partially obscured, seem to convey messages related to liberation, national unity, and resistance against external forces. The inclusion of text reinforces the painting’s function not merely as a visual representation but also as a form of political communication.
The overall effect is one of optimistic dynamism. Despite the presence of labor and potential hardship in the lower portion, the composition conveys a sense of hope for a prosperous future built on collective effort and ideological conviction. The layering of elements and the use of symbolic imagery suggest that this is not simply a depiction of a place but rather an idealized representation of its people, their aspirations, and their relationship to the land.