Peter Paul Rubens – Still life with a swan and two cooks (together with Frans Snyders)
197x325. Art Gallery Dresden
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
This is a vibrant and opulent still life painting, likely from the Baroque era, overflowing with a bounty of game and produce. Dominating the foreground is a large, plucked swan, its white feathers stark against the darker background. Beside it, a wild boar is displayed, its insides exposed, suggesting preparation for a feast. Numerous other birds, including peacocks with their iridescent plumage, are hung or laid out, alongside rabbits and other game.
In the background, a basket overflows with fresh vegetables like asparagus and artichokes, and a selection of fruits are piled in a wicker basket. The scene is animated by two figures, a man and a woman, presumably cooks or servants. They are depicted in conversation, the woman gesturing towards the array of food. The mans arm is around her waist, suggesting a familiar or perhaps romantic relationship. In the lower right corner, a mother dog and her puppies are shown, adding a touch of domesticity and life to the scene of death and plenty.
The subtexts of this painting are rich and multilayered. Firstly, its a powerful display of wealth and abundance, showcasing the successful hunt and the availability of plentiful food, likely for a wealthy household or for public consumption. The exotic birds like peacocks and the prominent swan signify luxury and status.
Secondly, the painting explores the contrast between life and death. The dead game animals are rendered with meticulous detail, emphasizing their former vitality, while elements like the fruits, vegetables, the people, and especially the dogs and puppies represent ongoing life.
The presence of the cooks and their interaction hints at the labor and human element behind the sustenance of the wealthy. Their intimate gesture could be interpreted as a brief moment of respite or human connection amidst the demanding work of preparing such a feast. It might also subtly allude to the social hierarchy of the time, where such abundance was often a result of the efforts of those in service.
Finally, the painting can be seen as a celebration of natures bounty and the skills of the hunt and preparation. It is a testament to the resources available and the ability to transform them into sustenance and even art.