Peter Paul Rubens (Attributed) – Samson’s Death
99x110. Getty Museum Los Angeles
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Around him swirls a flurry of figures, their expressions ranging from triumph to horror. A woman, positioned above the central figure, appears to be actively involved in his downfall; her body is pale and idealized, contrasting sharply with the muscularity of the man below. She grasps at something beyond the frame, perhaps indicating an unseen mechanism or support that contributes to his predicament. Her pose suggests a deliberate act, not merely passive observation.
Several other figures surround them: one, draped in vibrant red fabric, seems to be restraining or observing with a mixture of apprehension and satisfaction; another, clad in blue, appears to be actively participating in the event, his face contorted in an expression that could be interpreted as either malicious glee or horrified realization. The presence of numerous other figures, partially obscured by shadow and architectural elements, creates a sense of overwhelming force and collective action.
The setting is ambiguous but suggests a grand, classical architecture – columns, pilasters, and ornate detailing are visible – implying a space of power and authority. Debris litters the foreground, including what appears to be shattered stone pillars and fragments of a fallen structure, reinforcing the sense of destruction and upheaval. The color palette is dominated by warm tones – reds, golds, and browns – which heighten the drama and intensity of the scene. Pools of red pigment are visible at the lower right corner, likely representing blood, further emphasizing the violence inherent in the depicted event.
Subtextually, the painting explores themes of power, downfall, and betrayal. The central figure’s strength is clearly being undermined by a combination of external forces and perhaps internal weakness. The womans role introduces an element of feminine agency and potentially, treachery. The architectural setting suggests that this is not merely a personal tragedy but one with broader political or societal implications. The overall effect is one of profound loss and the fragility of even the most formidable power.