National Gallery of Art – Maria Verelst - Portrait of a Lady
C. 1715/1730, perhaps close to 1725. Oil on canvas, 91.4 x 71.1 cm. Maria Verelst (Dutch, 1680 1744). Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see the subject dressed in a rich blue gown with a low neckline, revealing a glimpse of her décolletage. The fabric appears weighty, suggesting quality and expense. The sleeves are gathered at the wrist, a fashionable detail indicative of the era. Her hands rest gently on what seems to be a draped surface, contributing to an impression of relaxed composure rather than rigid formality.
The woman’s hair is styled in loose waves, partially pulled back from her face and cascading down one shoulder. The color appears reddish-brown, subtly highlighted with lighter tones that suggest natural light. Her complexion is fair, rendered with a delicate pinkness on the cheeks and lips. The eyes are direct and observant, conveying intelligence and perhaps a hint of reserve.
The lighting in this painting is soft and diffused, illuminating her face and upper body while leaving the background shrouded in shadow. This technique serves to isolate the subject and focus attention on her features and attire. The artist’s brushwork appears relatively smooth, with subtle gradations of color creating a sense of volume and texture.
Subtly, the portrait conveys an impression of quiet strength and self-possession. The choice of blue for the gown might symbolize loyalty or nobility, while the overall presentation suggests a woman of considerable social standing. The lack of overt ornamentation – jewelry is absent – implies a focus on inner qualities rather than outward display. Theres a certain restraint in her expression; she doesn’t offer an overtly welcoming smile, but neither does she appear aloof. This ambiguity invites speculation about her character and the circumstances surrounding the portrait’s creation.