National Gallery of Art – Rembrandt Workshop - Portrait of Rembrandt
1650. Oil on canvas, 92 x 75.5 cm. Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man wears a distinctive brown velvet cap adorned with a patterned band, which adds visual interest and suggests a degree of status or individuality. Beneath the cap, his hair is visible, appearing somewhat disheveled, hinting at an unstudied naturalness rather than meticulous grooming. He is dressed in dark clothing – a doublet over what appears to be a white linen shirt – the fabric’s texture rendered with considerable detail. A glimpse of a hand holding a small, indistinct object is visible at the lower right corner; its purpose remains ambiguous and adds a layer of mystery to the scene.
The mans expression is complex. While there is an element of introspection or melancholy present in his gaze, it isn’t entirely somber. There is also a sense of quiet self-assurance, perhaps even a touch of defiance, conveyed through the set of his jaw and the slight upward curve of his lips. The lines etched around his eyes and mouth suggest age and experience, contributing to an impression of depth and character.
The artist’s handling of paint is notable for its texture and impasto – thickly applied paint that creates a three-dimensional effect. This technique is particularly evident in the rendering of the fabric folds and the sitters hair, adding richness and vitality to the surface. The dark background isnt merely an absence of detail; it actively shapes the perception of the figure by intensifying the impact of the illuminated areas.
Subtextually, the portrait seems to explore themes of self-awareness and introspection. The deliberate use of shadow suggests a contemplation of inner life, while the sitter’s direct gaze establishes a connection with the viewer that is both intimate and challenging. The ambiguous object held in his hand could be interpreted as a symbol of artistic tools or perhaps something more personal – a memento or a source of inspiration – leaving room for multiple interpretations. Overall, the work conveys a sense of psychological complexity and invites contemplation on the nature of identity and experience.