Seven Works of Mercy Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1571-1610)
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio – Seven Works of Mercy
Edit attribution
Download full size: 3572×5480 px (3,9 Mb)
Painter: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio
Album navigation:
The Italian painter Caravaggio completed his unique painting on the biblical theme, The Seven Acts of Mercy, in January 1607. Previously, artists had depicted the seven acts on separate canvases. Caravaggio was also to repeat the traditional embodiment of the precepts of the Gospel in paintings. But the artist took a new look at the process. For the cathedral of Pio Monte, which was in Naples, Caravaggio painted a large canvas on which he placed all 7 acts of mercy. According to the Gospel, the acts of mercy include 6 points, with another from the Old Testament added to them.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Caravaggio’s painting The Seven Acts of Mercy
The Italian painter Caravaggio completed his unique painting on the biblical theme, The Seven Acts of Mercy, in January 1607. Previously, artists had depicted the seven acts on separate canvases. Caravaggio was also to repeat the traditional embodiment of the precepts of the Gospel in paintings. But the artist took a new look at the process. For the cathedral of Pio Monte, which was in Naples, Caravaggio painted a large canvas on which he placed all 7 acts of mercy.
According to the Gospel, the acts of mercy include 6 points, with another from the Old Testament added to them. Christian tradition recommends that every believer do the following good deeds: give food to the hungry and water to the thirsty, shelter the stranger, share clothes with the naked, visit the sick and prisoners in prison. The last added item is the instruction to bury the dead.
Caravaggio has arranged all the acts of benevolence into a single composition. The image seems chaotic, but this only enhances the impression of the subjects shown. On the right a woman is feeding a prisoner, looking around with apprehension. The artist has combined two acts in one scene: feeding the hungry man and visiting the man in prison.
Near the woman we see the funeral procession. The body is carried out, lighting the way with a burning torch. A young man standing nearby tears his cloak to share his clothes with two poor people: one sick and the other naked.
On the left side of the canvas, the innkeeper receives the lonely wanderer. Just above, Samson from the jaw of an animal quenches his thirst. Mary with the Child and a pair of angels are watching.
Caravaggio has succeeded in masterfully combining many subjects. One can sense a pathetic mood in what is portrayed. With the help of shadows and the glare of light, the painter gives the picture a dramatic character. The result is a stunning work in the traditional Baroque style.
You cannot comment Why?
Below, a group of figures are clustered together, their expressions ranging from concern to indifference. Several hold lanterns aloft, casting stark pools of light that highlight individual faces and gestures while plunging other areas into deep shadow. This intense contrast creates a palpable sense of theatricality and emphasizes the emotional weight of the moment. A woman cradles an infant in her arms, her gaze directed towards the angel, suggesting a plea or hope for intervention. Another man appears to be assisting the fallen figure, his posture conveying a mixture of empathy and awkwardness.
The artist’s use of light is particularly striking; it doesnt merely illuminate but actively shapes the narrative. The darkness serves not only as background but also as an active element, isolating figures and intensifying their emotional states. This technique draws attention to the vulnerability of those depicted in shadow, contrasting them with the radiant presence of the angel.
The arrangement of bodies is dynamic; theres a sense of movement and interaction despite the overall stillness of the painted image. The fallen man’s limbs are splayed out, creating a diagonal line that leads the viewer’s eye across the composition. This visual flow is counterbalanced by the verticality of the angel’s descent, establishing a tension between earthly suffering and divine grace.
Subtly embedded within this scene are suggestions of societal responsibility and human fallibility. The presence of multiple witnesses implies an obligation to act, while the varied reactions of the figures underscore the complexities of compassion and moral judgment. The painting seems to explore not just the act of mercy itself but also the internal struggles that accompany it – the hesitation, the discomfort, the potential for indifference. It is a visual meditation on the human condition and the enduring need for empathy in a world marked by suffering.