Trophies and Ghosts:
The Dark History of the Louvre’s Collections
Automatic translate
Millions of people walk the halls of the Louvre every year, admiring the impeccable beauty of its works of art. The Venus de Milo, the Victory of Samothrace, the Mona Lisa — these names sound synonymous with grandeur. But behind the glittering façade of the world’s most visited museum lies a different story. It is a chronicle of conquests, political ambitions, and ethical dilemmas. Many of the Louvre’s greatest treasures are war trophies, the origins of which the museum prefers to keep secret.
The Conqueror Museum
The Louvre’s history as a repository of trophies began with Napoleon Bonaparte. For him, art was not only an aesthetic value but also a powerful propaganda tool. He sought to transform Paris into the new capital of the world, and the Louvre, renamed the "Museum Napoleon," into the crown jewel of his empire. This goal was achieved through the systematic and organized confiscation of works of art from conquered countries.
Italy suffered the most. The Apollo Belvedere and the sculpture group Laocoön and His Sons were transported from the Vatican to Paris. From Venice, Napoleon took the famous quadriga — the bronze horses from St. Mark’s Basilica, which later adorned the Carrousel Arch right in front of the Louvre. Along with them came Paolo Veronese’s gigantic painting, The Marriage at Cana. It was removed from the wall of the refectory of the monastery of San Giorgio Maggiore, cut up, and shipped to France.
These weren’t random lootings. Special commissioners accompanying the army compiled lists of masterpieces to be confiscated. The capitulation treaties of Italian, German, and Austrian cities contained clauses regarding the handover of works of art. Thus, the Louvre was enriched with works by Raphael, Titian, and Rubens. It was a triumph of power, captured in art.
Ghosts of Returned Masterpieces
Napoleon’s empire collapsed, and in 1815, the victorious allies demanded justice. A process now known as restitution — the return of cultural treasures to their rightful owners — began. The Duke of Wellington, commander of the British forces, insisted that the plundered property be returned. This decision sparked outrage in Paris.
The dismantling of the "Napoleon Museum" has begun. The bronze horses were removed from the arch and sent back to Venice. The "Apollo Belvedere" returned to the Vatican. Dozens and hundreds of paintings and sculptures left the Louvre’s halls and returned to their homeland. Today, they are the "ghosts" of the collection, a reminder that the museum’s greatness was temporary and built on the law of the strong.
However, not everything was returned. The enormous canvas "The Marriage at Cana" remained in Paris. The French side claimed the painting was too large and fragile to transport. Instead, a painting by Charles Le Brun — an unequal substitute — was sent to Venice. This incident remains a subject of dispute between Italy and France.
Colonial era artifacts
After the Napoleonic Wars, France began a new era of expansion — colonialist. Along with it, the way museum collections were enriched changed. Art and artifacts were now brought from Egypt, the Middle East, and North Africa. Entire halls were dedicated to Assyrian and Egyptian art in the Louvre.
Many of these artifacts, such as the winged bulls with human heads from the palace of Sargon II, were obtained through archaeological excavations. These expeditions formally received permits from local authorities, but the conditions were often uneven. Today, many newly independent countries are asking a fair question: how legal was the export of their heritage? Should these artifacts remain in Paris or be returned to their home countries?
This issue remains one of the most pressing for modern museums. The Louvre, like other major European institutions, is under increasing pressure. Debates over the restitution of colonial artifacts demonstrate that the provenance of collections is not just an academic pursuit, but a lively and sensitive topic.
Echoes of the last great war
The twentieth century added another dark chapter to the history of museum treasures. During World War II, the Nazis engaged in unprecedented looting of art across Europe, primarily from Jewish collections. After the war, the Allies created a special program to locate and return the stolen art.
Some of the recovered works, whose owners could not be identified, were temporarily transferred to French museums, including the Louvre. These works were designated "MNR" (Musées Nationaux Récupération, or National Museums. Return). Hundreds of these works remain in the Louvre’s halls and storerooms. They do not belong to the museum, but are awaiting the identification of their rightful heirs.
Each painting marked MNR is a silent witness to the tragedy. It reminds us of broken destinies and lost lives. The museum is actively researching the provenance of these works, but the process is slow.
The history of the Louvre is a story not only of beauty but also of power. The museum’s collections reflect the rise and fall of empires, the ambitions of rulers, and the tragedies of nations. Recognizing this complex past does not diminish the grandeur of the masterpieces. On the contrary, it adds depth, forcing the viewer to see not only the artist’s brushstroke but also the invisible trace of history that brought this painting to the Parisian gallery.
- Valery Fokin presented a new version of the play "Your Gogol"
- Poland intends to return a number of paintings exported after World War II
- The fate of the paintings missing
- Heirs of the Jewish collector demand from the Austrian government the restitution of the masterpiece of Gustav Klimt "Beethoven Frieze"
- Museum director in Vienna demands time limits on restitution of art stolen by the Nazis
You cannot comment Why?