Philosophy of Music:
Perception and Emotions Automatic translate

Philosophy of music, which studies perception and emotion, is a cross-disciplinary field of study. It examines how people perceive music and the causes of emotional responses. This interdisciplinary field combines philosophical concepts, psychological theories, neuroscience research, and musicological approaches.

Historical context

Research into the connection between music and emotion has deep historical roots. Ancient Greek philosophers, including Plato and Aristotle, paid considerable attention to the ability of music to influence a person’s emotional state. Plato discussed the influence of different musical modes on the listener’s character, and Aristotle explored the concept of catharsis — emotional cleansing through art, including music.

During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, music was viewed through the prism of religious and mathematical concepts. In the 17th and 18th centuries, the theory of affects became widespread, establishing a connection between certain musical patterns and specific emotional states.

The modern stage of studying the relationship between music and emotions began in the 19th century. Eduard Hanslick in his work "On the Musical-Beautiful" (1854) laid the foundations of formalism, arguing that music is a pure form that should be evaluated solely from an aesthetic point of view, and not as an expression of specific emotions.

The 20th century brought new approaches to the topic. The work of Leonard Meyer, especially his book Emotion and Meaning in Music (1956), had a significant impact on the field. Meyer argued that music should be viewed from the perspective of the listener, rather than from the perspective of the composer’s creation of the work.

Main theoretical approaches

There are several key theoretical schools of thought in the philosophy of music and emotion, each offering its own explanation of the relationship between musical structures and emotional responses.

Prospect Theory

Perspective theory suggests that the perception of music involves the adoption of a particular perspective or frame of reference. This perspective selects content — the implicit meaning. This content is an important agent in the perception of form. Thus, the common assumption that we judge content by form (signification) is problematized. The opposite is also possible: content causes us to perceive form.

These processes occur at a preattentive level, that is, before conscious attention. Research shows that people can respond emotionally to music without even consciously perceiving it. This leads to an interesting consequence: listeners do not always associate the emotion evoked by music with the piece of music itself.

Cognitive approach

Proponents of the cognitivist approach view the essence of emotion as involving value judgments and beliefs of a certain kind. According to this position, music cannot directly evoke emotions because it does not provide the propositional content necessary for such judgments.

This approach often leads to two results: either to the idea that musical expressiveness is somehow akin to human expressive gesture, or to the view that music evokes feelings that have no specific object and, therefore, lack the necessary connection with music.

Emotivist approach

The theory of emotivism states that music is both a cause and an effect of feelings. When we perceive music, we react to it emotionally. Emotivists believe that music directly causes emotional states in listeners.

According to this approach, the creation of emotion occurs within the listener, although stimulated by an external source. In this case, composers, performers and listeners do not necessarily focus on the affective aspect of a musical work, and there is no need to assign specific meaning to individual elements of the work.

Process theory

Philosopher Jennifer Robinson proposes a "process theory of emotion, process theory of music," or process theory. It posits a reciprocal relationship between cognition and the emergence of emotion.

Robinson argues that the process of emotional arousal begins with "an automatic, immediate response that initiates motor and autonomic activity and prepares us for possible action," triggering a cognitive process that allows listeners to identify the emotion being experienced. This sequence of events continually interacts with new, incoming information.

According to Robinson, emotions can transform into each other, creating confusions, conflicts, and ambiguities that make it difficult to describe the emotional state at a particular moment in a single word. Internal feelings are more correctly viewed as the result of multiple emotional flows.

Robinson characterizes music as a series of simultaneous processes, making it an ideal medium for reflecting the cognitive aspects of emotion, such as the way musical themes strive toward resolution or leitmotifs reflect memory processes. These parallel musical processes can reinforce or conflict with each other, thereby expressing the way in which one emotion is "transformed into another over time."

Expectancy Theory in Music Perception

Expectancy theory, developed by Leonard Meyer and later developed by David Huron, offers an important concept for understanding emotional responses to music.

Meyer’s approach

Meyer can be described as a formalist in the sense that he analyzes how musical structures affect us emotionally. The basic idea is that the perception of musical structure follows Gestalt laws (e.g. the law of good continuation, the law of closure). These laws generate expectations. Emotions arise when these expectations are thwarted or fulfilled.

Huron’s approach

A new version of expectancy theory was presented by David Huron in his book Sweet Anticipation (2006), where he draws on modern findings in the psychology of expectation. These studies show that expectations are formed by learning rather than by Gestalt principles. Huron offers a theory of music and emotion based on a psychological approach.

The difference between expressed and evoked emotions

An important aspect of the study of music and emotion is the distinction between the emotions expressed in music (perceived) and the emotions evoked in the listener (experienced).

Expressed emotions

Expressed emotions are the emotions that listeners perceive in the music itself. For example, a listener may recognize that a particular piece of music sounds “sad” or “happy,” regardless of their own emotional experiences.

The perception of emotions in music is influenced by structural elements (tempo, tonality, dynamics, timbre), as well as the cultural context and musical experience of the listener.

Evoked emotions

Evoked emotions are the emotional responses that music evokes in the listener. For example, listening to “sad” music may make one person feel sad, while another person may feel nostalgia or even pleasure.

Research shows that the emotions evoked by music vary widely and depend on a variety of factors, including personality, current mood, previous experiences, and situational context.

The relationship between expressed and evoked emotions

Scientists have studied the relationship between these two types of emotional responses to music. Overall, the research shows that ratings of expressed and evoked emotions are highly correlated, but not identical.

However, the results are mixed regarding which type of response has a stronger effect and how exactly the two types of responses relate to each other.

Some studies show that emotions expressed in music are more intense than emotions evoked by the same piece of music. Other studies show that the strength of perception and evoked emotions depends on the structure of the piece of music. There is also evidence that emotional reactions exceed the strength of the listeners’ perception of emotions.

The neurological basis of musical emotions

Modern neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) allow researchers to study brain activation in response to musical stimuli.

Brain systems

Research demonstrates the involvement of several interconnected brain systems:

1. Auditory cortex: Performs primary processing of musical sounds, including pitch, timbre, and temporal patterns.

2. Limbic system: includes the amygdala and hippocampus, plays a central role in emotional processing and emotional memory.

3. The striatum: Activated during peak pleasure when listening to music, especially the "goosebumps" sensation.

4. Prefrontal cortex: Involved in complex cognitive processes, including expectations and perception of musical structure.

5. Cerebellum: involved in the perception of rhythm and in coordinating motor responses to music.

These systems do not operate in isolation, but form an interconnected network that generates a complex emotional response to music.

The role of neurotransmitters

Listening to pleasant music is associated with the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with the brain’s reward system. Research confirms that dopamine is released not only during the peak of musical pleasure, but also in anticipation of that peak.

Other neurotransmitters, including serotonin, endorphins, and oxytocin, may also play a role in shaping emotional responses to music. These chemicals may explain music’s ability to influence mood, reduce stress and pain, and enhance social bonds.

Cross-cultural aspects of musical perception

The perception of music and emotional responses to it have both universal and culture-specific aspects.

Universal aspects

Research shows certain universal patterns in the perception of basic emotions in music. For example, fast tempos and major keys are often associated with joy, while slow tempos and minor keys are often associated with sadness in many cultures.

These common features may be related to the biological basis of sound and emotion perception, as well as to some general characteristics of human vocal expression of emotion.

Culturally specific aspects

Despite the presence of universal features, musical systems of different cultures differ significantly. These differences concern:

• Tonal systems (equal temperament in Western music, microtonal systems in Arabic and Indian music)
• Rhythmic structures (simple meters in Western music, complex rhythmic cycles in Indian music)
• Timbre preferences (different attitudes towards dissonance)
• Expressive techniques (various methods of vocal ornamentation)

Emotional associations with specific musical elements may vary across cultures. For example, ragas in Indian classical music are associated with specific emotional states (rasas) that may not have direct analogs in the Western musical tradition.

Enculturation and Musical Perception

The process of enculturation — the acquisition of cultural knowledge through experience — significantly influences the perception of music. Listeners develop a schematic understanding of the musical structures of their culture, which influences their expectations and emotional responses.

Research shows that listeners are more accurate in identifying the emotional content of music from their own culture than music from unfamiliar cultures. However, the ability to recognize basic emotions (joy, sadness) is also preserved when perceiving music from other cultures, which confirms the existence of both universal and culture-specific mechanisms of musical perception.

Phenomenology of musical experience

The phenomenological approach to music perception focuses on the immediate, subjective experience of listening, viewing it as a special way of being-in-the-world.

The temporal aspect of musical experience

Music exists in time, and its perception involves complex processes of retaining the past and anticipating the future. Edmund Husserl described this process through the concepts of "retention" (retention of what has just been heard) and "protention" (expectation of what is about to be heard).

The musical experience creates a special type of temporality that may differ from the ordinary perception of time. The listener may be immersed in “musical time,” where the subjective experience of duration is transformed by the musical structure.

The corporeality of musical perception

Music perception includes not only auditory but also kinesthetic aspects. Music evokes bodily reactions - from involuntary tapping of the foot to complex emotional bodily sensations.

Phenomenologists emphasize that musical experience is an embodied rather than purely cognitive process. The body acts as a resonator through which music is experienced.

The transformative potential of musical experience

An intense musical experience can temporarily alter a listener’s self-perception. During moments of profound musical experience, a person may experience:

• Dissolution of ego boundaries
• Altered perception of time and space
• A feeling of deep connection with the music or other listeners
• Transcendental or spiritual experiences

Such experiences are described in various cultural traditions and constitute an important aspect of the musical experience.

Musical expression and emotional content

The problem of musical expression is one of the key ones in the philosophy of music.

Formalist position

Formalists such as Eduard Hanslick argue that music is pure form, with no emotional content of its own. According to this position, the emotional qualities attributed to music are projections of the listener’s feelings.

Formalists emphasize that music cannot be "sad" or "happy" in the same sense in which these terms are applied to human emotions, since music does not have consciousness or intentionality.

Expressionist position

Expressionists, on the other hand, argue that music can actually express emotions. There are different versions of this position:

1. Expression Theory: Music expresses the real emotions of the composer or performer.
2. Imaginary personality theory: Music creates the impression of an imaginary personality expressing emotions.
3. Recognition theory: Musical structures are structurally similar to patterns of human emotional expressions.

Improved formalism

Contemporary theorists such as Peter Kivvy propose the concept of "refined formalism." According to this position, the emotional qualities of music are objective properties of the music itself, but they are aesthetic rather than psychological properties.

Emotional terms are applied to music metaphorically, but these metaphors are based on real structural similarities between musical forms and human emotional expressions.

Music and cognitive processes

Modern cognitive science offers new approaches to understanding the relationship between musical perception and emotions.

Schemes and categorization

Listeners perceive music through cognitive schemas — mental structures that organize perception. These schemas are formed through experience and include:

• Tonal Hierarchies
• Metric schemes
• Stylistic expectations
• Formal templates

Cognitive categorization allows listeners to recognize emotional expressions in music based on similarities to other expressive media, including human speech and movement.

Metaphorical Thinking

Cognitive linguists George Lakoff and Mark Johnson have shown that metaphor is not just a literary device, but a fundamental cognitive mechanism. Musical perception is filled with metaphorical projections:

• Pitch (spatial metaphor)
• Movement of melody (metaphor of physical movement)
• Musical harmony (metaphor of tension-relaxation)
• Timbre (tactile and visual metaphors: “bright”, “warm”, “sharp” sound)

These metaphorical projections help listeners structure abstract musical experiences through more concrete domains of experience and facilitate emotional perceptions of music.

Embodied cognition

Embodied cognition theory suggests that cognitive processes are rooted in bodily experience. When applied to music, this manifests itself in several ways:

• Motor resonance: listening to rhythmic music activates the motor areas of the brain
• Mirror neurons: activated both by performing and observing an action, possibly playing a role in empathic perception of musical expression
• Bodily metaphors: musical perception is often described through bodily sensations (heaviness, lightness, pressure, flight)

Musical Emotions and the Evolutionary Approach

The evolutionary perspective considers human musical abilities in the context of their adaptive significance.

The origin of musical ability

There are various hypotheses about the origin of human musical abilities:

1. By-product theory: Musical ability is a by-product of other cognitive adaptations, such as language ability (Steven Pinker).

2. Sexual selection theory: Musical ability evolved as a means of attracting a mate, demonstrating genetic quality through the ability to perform complex vocal communication (Geoffrey Miller).

3. Social cohesion theory: Music promoted social cohesion among groups by facilitating cooperative action and strengthening group identity (Stephen Brown).

4. Parental care theory: Musical communication between mother and child (’mother talk’) promoted emotional bonding and child development (Ellen Disanayake).

Each of these theories offers different explanations for the emotional power of music and its universal presence in all known cultures.

Universal aspects of musical expression

From an evolutionary perspective, certain aspects of musical expressiveness may be universal because they are linked to biological signals. For example:

• Fast tempo, high volume and irregular rhythm are associated with anxiety and fear (acoustic characteristics associated with danger)
• A soft, gentle rhythm and moderate tempo are associated with calmness (safety-related characteristics)
• A high, clear voice with rising melodic contours is associated with joy (characteristics associated with positive social cues)

These biologically based links between acoustic characteristics and emotional meanings may explain cross-cultural similarities in the emotional perception of music.

Music Therapy and the Emotional Impact of Music

The practical application of theories about the relationship between music and emotions can be seen in the field of music therapy.

Therapeutic mechanisms

Music therapy uses various mechanisms of the emotional impact of music:

1. Mood Resonance: Music that matches a person’s current emotional state can help them become more aware and accepting of that state.

2. Contrasting effect: Music that differs from the current emotional state can help change mood.

3. Catharsis: Emotionally charged music can serve as a means of emotional release.

4. Musical interaction: Playing or listening to music together promotes social connection and emotional exchange.

Clinical applications

Music therapy has been shown to be effective in treating a variety of conditions:

• Depression and anxiety disorders
• Chronic pain
• Neurological conditions (Parkinson’s disease, stroke recovery)
• Dementia and Alzheimer’s disease
• Autism and other developmental disorders

Neurobiological studies confirm that music activates the brain’s reward systems, influences the autonomic nervous system, and modulates the release of neurotransmitters, which explains its therapeutic potential.

The aesthetics of musical experience

The aesthetic aspect of musical experience is related to the values ​​we attribute to music and the criteria for evaluating it.

Musical pleasure

Enjoyment of music is a complex experience that includes various aspects:

1. Sensory pleasure: direct enjoyment of the sound qualities of music.

2. Cognitive pleasure: satisfaction from recognizing patterns, predicting musical events, and appreciating musical structure.

3. Emotional pleasure: the experience of emotions in response to music, which can include both positive and negative emotions.

4. Social pleasure: the joy of shared musical experiences and a sense of belonging.

Philosophers debate which of these aspects is central to the aesthetic value of music.

The concept of musical beauty

The concept of musical beauty has evolved over time:

• For the ancient Greeks, the beauty of music lay in mathematical proportions and harmony that reflected cosmic order.
• During the Enlightenment, the emphasis shifted to order, symmetry and balance.
• Romanticism brought to the forefront the emotional expressiveness and subjective qualities of musical experience.
• Modernism challenged traditional notions of beauty by exploring dissonance, atonality and new sonic possibilities.

Contemporary aesthetics recognizes a multiplicity of criteria for musical beauty, which may vary depending on cultural context, genre, and individual preferences.

Social aspects of musical emotions

Musical emotions have an important social dimension.

The social function of musical emotions

Music has historically served as a means of creating and strengthening social bonds:

• Synchronization of emotions through ritual music
• Formation of group identity through shared musical preferences
• Facilitation of interpersonal emotional interaction
• Transmission of cultural values ​​and emotional patterns

Research shows that playing and listening to music together promotes the release of oxytocin, a hormone associated with social bonding.

Musical Subcultures and Identity

Musical preferences often serve as a marker of social identity. Musical subcultures shape not only aesthetic but also emotional norms – ideas about what emotions are valuable and how they should be expressed.

Belonging to a particular musical subculture can influence patterns of emotional response to music. For example, metal fans may experience positive emotions when listening to music that may elicit negative reactions in untrained listeners.

Emotional communication through music

Music serves as a means of emotional communication between the composer, performer and listener. This process includes:

• Coding: The composer creates a musical structure that reflects a specific emotional content
• Performance: The musician interprets this structure through the expressive means of performance
• Decoding: The listener recognizes emotional content based on musical conventions and personal experience

The effectiveness of this communication depends on common cultural codes and musical conventions.

Philosophical questions and perspectives

The philosophical study of the relationship between music, perception and emotion raises fundamental questions about the nature of human experience and cognition.

The problem of intersubjectivity

Musical experience shows how people can share subjective experiences without verbal communication. This makes music an interesting case for studying intersubjectivity — the ability of people to share subjective states.

Philosophers debate whether the intersubjectivity of musical experience is based on:

• General biological mechanisms of perception
• Cultural conventions and training
• Combinations of natural and cultural factors

The problem of musical meaning

The question of whether music has "meaning" and what the nature of this meaning is remains a matter of philosophical debate:

• Formalists argue that music has only intra-musical meaning, based on the structural relationships between sounds.
• Referentialists believe that music can refer to extra-musical ideas, emotions, and images.
• Expressionists believe that the meaning of music lies in the expression of emotions.
• Pragmatists view musical meaning as arising in the context of music’s use.

Prospects for interdisciplinary research

The contemporary study of music and emotions increasingly relies on an interdisciplinary approach that combines:

• Philosophical research (phenomenology, aesthetics, philosophy of consciousness)
• Psychological research (emotional reactions, cognitive processes)
• Neurobiological research (brain mechanisms of music perception)
• Anthropological research (cross-cultural aspects of musical emotions)
• Musicological research (structural analysis of emotionally expressive music)

Integrating these approaches helps create a more complete picture of the complex relationships between music, perception, and emotion.

Final thoughts

The philosophy of music, with its focus on perception and emotion, is a rich field of study that draws on aspects of psychology, neuroscience, anthropology, aesthetics, and the philosophy of mind. For centuries, thinkers have attempted to explain music’s remarkable ability to evoke profound emotional responses and create meaningful experiences without obvious propositional content.

Modern research confirms that musical emotions arise from a complex interaction between the structural elements of music, biological mechanisms, cognitive processes, cultural context, and individual experience. Music creates a special form of communication that can bypass the verbal level and directly affect emotional systems.

Music’s ability to evoke a variety of emotional responses, from basic affects to complex aesthetic emotions, makes it a valuable tool for studying human emotionality. As an object of philosophical inquiry, music continues to pose questions about the nature of emotion, the problem of expression, the intersubjectivity of experience, and the relationship between body and mind.

Musical experience also draws attention to the temporal nature of human existence, showing how structuring time through sound can create meaningful experiences. Through music, we can become more aware of the dynamic nature of our perception and emotional life.

Ultimately, the philosophical study of music, perception, and emotion goes beyond purely theoretical interest. It helps us better understand fundamental aspects of human experience and can contribute to practical applications such as music therapy, education, and the creation of more humane technologies.