Cinema. Lost meaning. Automatic translate
Cinema, music, literature. Three words that make up a huge concept of creativity. Since ancient times, people have been drawn to this, at first, troubled poets and bards composed poems and songs, then, it all connected with music, something was born that was previously unprecedented, and only then, it all came together in world cinema .
Today, I want to turn to the cinema.
Recall films of the USSR. They contained all the power of this power. These works, then still black and white, carried the enormous meaning that was so necessary during the same war, during turbulent times of perestroika, which always helped people not to forget who they were and what is the meaning of life. The USSR taught the people to go to the end, never give up. Be a winner.
The first films of Russia. The idea of “victory”, which was, in fact, the main one during the USSR, was a little lost. But the films continued to delight, of course, not as they did before, but people didn’t notice the difference, they lived and changed, and the cinema also changed with them.
Let’s take a look nowadays. The sexual revolution is long past and it is time to move on, but we have stopped. We stomp on the spot, imitating all over Europe, even rather not Europe, but America. With their stupid humor, with their skits, which have always been for Americans the main genre in the movie. The amount of pornography is amazing. We do not evolve. We are degrading, more and more every day.
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Скажите, пожалуйста, а кто автор этой статьи? После прочтения сего остался привкус недоумения... Какой смысл ее?? Так и не понял, что хотел сказать автор.. не то очерк, не то размышления на свободную тему (как школьное сочинение), не то рецензия к чему-то... Зачем тогда вообще писать подобное?? С одним лишь согласен с автором, что в кино вся мощь Советской эпохи чувствовалась более, чем в других сферах жизни. Насмешил вывод автора.. Мы не эволюционируем. Мы деградируем, с каждым днём всё больше и больше. А отчего автор пришел к такому выводу?? И в чем, так и не понял, автор считает развитие отечественного кинематографа? Готов подискутировать)
You cannot comment Why?