Part 1 Louvre – Antoine Le Nain (c. 1588-1648), Louis Le Nain (c. 1593-1648) or Mathieu Le Nain (1607-1677) -- Supper at Emmaus
1645, 75х92
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a central figure, clad in blue robes, extending his hand towards an older man seated at the table. This gesture appears pivotal, initiating a chain reaction of responses among those present. The elder’s face is etched with surprise and dawning understanding; he leans forward slightly, his hands clasped as if in disbelief. His posture conveys both humility and profound emotion.
Around them, other individuals react to this unfolding moment. A young boy seated at the foot of the table stares intently, while a woman holding a child observes from a distance with an expression that blends curiosity and apprehension. Further back, several figures are partially obscured by shadow, their faces indistinct but contributing to the sense of collective witnessing.
The artist depicted a range of ages and ethnicities within the group, suggesting universality in the narrative being portrayed. The inclusion of children emphasizes the generational aspect of faith and belief. A dog lies near the table’s edge, seemingly oblivious to the significance of the event unfolding before it – a detail that adds a touch of everyday realism to the scene.
The setting itself is unremarkable: a simple room with a stone archway visible in the background. This understated backdrop serves to focus attention on the human drama taking place at the table. The objects placed upon the table – bread, fruit, and vessels – are rendered with meticulous detail, contributing to the painting’s overall sense of naturalism.
Subtly, there is a suggestion of social hierarchy within the group; some figures are more elaborately dressed than others, hinting at varying degrees of status or wealth. However, the shared experience of this moment seems to transcend any such distinctions. The artists choice to depict ordinary people in an intimate setting lends a sense of accessibility and immediacy to the scene, inviting viewers to contemplate themes of faith, recognition, and human connection.