Part 1 Louvre – Guercino (1591-1666) -- Hersilia Separating Romulus and Tatius, King of the Sabines
c.1645, 253х267
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The Roman soldier appears to be in the midst of seizing the Sabine woman; his face is contorted with exertion, and he grips her arm tightly. The Sabine leader, positioned opposite him, seems equally engaged in a struggle, though his posture suggests a degree of resistance rather than outright aggression. He holds a shield, further emphasizing his defensive stance.
Surrounding these central figures are numerous other individuals – both Roman soldiers and Sabine captives – caught up in the tumult. Several soldiers brandish swords and spears, creating an atmosphere of imminent danger and potential bloodshed. The presence of captive women, some visibly distressed, underscores the brutality inherent in the conflict.
The artist employs a dramatic use of light and shadow to heighten the emotional impact of the scene. Strong illumination focuses on the central figures, drawing attention to their interaction while leaving much of the background shrouded in darkness. This contrast amplifies the sense of urgency and tension. The sky above is rendered with swirling blues and whites, adding a dynamic element to the composition and suggesting an atmosphere charged with unrest.
Beyond the immediate depiction of physical conflict, subtexts relating to power dynamics and societal norms emerge. The woman’s intervention can be interpreted as a challenge to established hierarchies – a direct confrontation between female agency and male dominance within a context of war and abduction. Her act of separation suggests a desire for resolution or perhaps an attempt to prevent further violence. The presence of the Sabine captives highlights the vulnerability of women in times of conflict, while also hinting at potential resistance and resilience. The overall effect is one of complex emotional layering – a portrayal not merely of battle but of human interaction within its devastating consequences.