Ignacio Diaz Olano – #30077
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see two women meticulously working with flax fibers. One, positioned on the left, appears to be scutching – separating the woody core from the usable fiber – while the other operates a spinning jenny, drawing out and twisting the prepared flax into yarn. Their postures are characterized by focused concentration; their expressions suggest a quiet diligence born of repetitive labor. The artist has rendered their clothing in simple, functional garments typical of working-class individuals – dark skirts, blouses with visible collars, and head coverings that likely serve both practical and cultural purposes.
Behind the women, ascending stone steps leading to an upper level, stands a young boy. He is dressed in lighter attire, suggesting perhaps a slightly higher social standing or a role distinct from the manual labor of the women. The presence of laundry hanging above on a line reinforces the domestic setting and hints at the everyday routines of this household.
The palette is dominated by earthy tones – browns, grays, and muted greens – which underscore the humble nature of the environment and the lives depicted. The limited color range contributes to an overall feeling of austerity and perhaps even hardship. The artist’s brushwork appears loose and textured, particularly in rendering the flax fibers and the rough stone steps, adding a tactile quality to the scene.
Subtly embedded within this depiction is a commentary on labor and social structure. While the women are clearly central to the work being performed, the boys presence suggests a potential transition away from manual tasks or perhaps an aspiration for a different future. The painting evokes themes of rural life, industry, and the quiet dignity of those engaged in essential but often overlooked trades. It is likely intended not merely as a representation of a specific moment, but as a broader reflection on the realities of working-class existence within a particular time period.