Roerich N.K. – In convent (sketch, initial version)
1914. Paper, pastel, tempera, charcoal. 22.4 x 25.6 cm.
Location: Museum of Russian Art, Kiev (Київський музей росiйського мистецтва).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A solitary figure, clad in what appears to be a monastic habit, descends a set of stone steps toward the viewer. The figure’s posture suggests introspection or perhaps resignation; their head is bowed, obscuring facial features and contributing to an overall impression of solitude and melancholy. The limited detail afforded to this individual emphasizes their role as a symbolic presence within the larger architectural framework.
The light source remains ambiguous, casting deep shadows that further accentuate the enclosed nature of the space. Theres a sense of artificiality in the illumination; it doesn’t appear to originate from a natural window but rather seems to emanate from an unseen point within the structure itself. This contributes to the feeling of being trapped or isolated.
The artist employed a distinctive style, characterized by simplified forms and a flattened perspective. The absence of traditional depth cues reinforces the sense of confinement and emphasizes the two-dimensionality of the canvas. The use of color is particularly noteworthy; the pervasive blues evoke feelings of coolness, serenity, but also potentially sadness or melancholy.
Subtly embedded within the architectural details are decorative elements – relief carvings and medallions – that hint at a rich history and tradition. However, these embellishments appear somewhat obscured by the overall darkness and the fragmented style of execution, suggesting a decline or perhaps a suppression of that heritage. The painting seems to explore themes of faith, isolation, and the weight of institutional life, leaving room for interpretation regarding the individual’s relationship with their surroundings and the broader spiritual context.