Temple # 50 Roerich N.K. (Part 2)
Roerich N.K. – Temple # 50
1920. Canvas, oil.89.5 x 135 cm.
Edit attribution
Download full size: 789×520 px (0,1 Mb)
Back to album: Roerich N.K. (Part 2)
Location: Collection and N. N.D.Lobanovyh-Rostovsky. London, UK (part of the collection moved to the St. Petersburg State Museum of Theater and Music)
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a limited palette dominated by muted greens, grays, and blacks, contributing to an atmosphere of solemnity and perhaps even melancholy. Light appears diffused and indirect, casting the structure in shadow while highlighting certain architectural details through subtle tonal variations. The sky above is rendered as a swirling mass of dark green hues, evoking a sense of foreboding or impending change.
The foreground features a low wall that partially obscures the base of the building, creating a visual barrier between the viewer and the depicted scene. Sparse vegetation – a few trees and shrubs – are scattered around the structure, adding a touch of naturalism to the otherwise stylized environment. The overall effect is one of isolation and timelessness; the building appears detached from its surroundings, existing within a space that transcends specific temporal or geographical boundaries.
Subtly, theres an impression of decay or abandonment. While the building itself remains structurally sound in the depiction, the muted colors and somber atmosphere suggest a loss of vitality or spiritual significance. The simplified forms and flattened perspective contribute to this sense of detachment, as if the structure exists more as a memory or symbol than a tangible reality. Its possible that the artist intended to convey a commentary on the passage of time, the fragility of faith, or the enduring power of cultural heritage in the face of adversity. The absence of human figures further reinforces the feeling of solitude and introspection.