Stream in the woods. Siverskaya. Etude Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin (1832-1898)
Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin – Stream in the woods. Siverskaya. Etude
Edit attribution
Download full size: 759×1000 px (0,2 Mb)
Painter: Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin
Shishkin is famous for the fact that he can depict very realistically all the small and seemingly insignificant areas of his native land. By the slightest strokes of the master, it is immediately clear that the artist is unable to imagine himself without his native Russia. "The stream in the woods" as if alive on the canvas, it seems that you can even hear the birds singing and the noise of the grove. The viewer can see a beautiful pine forest with a running brook.
Description of Ivan Shishkin’s painting "Brook in the Woods".
Shishkin is famous for the fact that he can depict very realistically all the small and seemingly insignificant areas of his native land. By the slightest strokes of the master, it is immediately clear that the artist is unable to imagine himself without his native Russia. "The stream in the woods" as if alive on the canvas, it seems that you can even hear the birds singing and the noise of the grove.
The viewer can see a beautiful pine forest with a running brook. Around him stand pine trees. You can see that some of the pines are already very old and look like some giants, their branches are spread apart, but they do not have a single needle.
In spite of this, they are still big and strong. Next, the viewer draws attention to the nearby, still young pines, which seem to ask the formidable giants to squeeze in and give room closer to the living and rushing brook.
Naturally, the brook is the main thing in this picture and occupies the central place in the exposition. Its every turn and play of light, is drawn with the utmost precision. You should also pay attention to the way every blade of grass is drawn, tending to lean towards the water and stretching upwards.
But needless to say, the life of the brook in the woods can not boast of its ease, because the road of this fun and dynamic stream, blocked by rocks. That’s why it has to find another way to get to the river or lake.
The painting wonderfully plays with the play of shadow and light. Despite the fact that the stream, together with the forest, are in shadow in the foreground of the painting. In the background, they are fully illuminated by the bright sunlight. Also worth paying attention to the bright glade, and between the trees, you can distinguish the blue sky.
Shishkin has created a truly fabulous landscape this time, which can fit in with a large number of Russian fairy tales. Just wait until the hut on chicken legs appears.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The artist employed a palette primarily composed of greens – ranging from deep emeralds in shadow to vibrant yellows where sunlight strikes – interspersed with browns and ochres that define the tree trunks and undergrowth. The brushwork appears loose and expressive, contributing to an overall impression of immediacy and spontaneity. Details are suggested rather than meticulously rendered; individual leaves are indistinct, and the texture of the bark is implied through broad strokes.
The stream serves as a central visual element, drawing the eye into the depths of the forest. Its presence introduces a sense of tranquility and natural flow. The rocks within the stream bed are partially submerged, creating subtle reflections that further enhance the play of light and shadow.
A feeling of enclosure pervades the scene; the dense trees create a barrier around the viewer, suggesting a secluded and intimate space. This contributes to an atmosphere of quiet contemplation and immersion in nature. The absence of human presence reinforces this sense of solitude and underscores the power of the natural world. It is possible to interpret the work as an exploration of the restorative qualities of wilderness, or perhaps a meditation on the passage of time within a timeless landscape.