Part 1 – Bartholomeus Breenbergh (1599-1657) - Landscape with Cimon and Iphigenia
1640. 22x33
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A significant portion of the foreground is occupied by a cluster of large rocks, partially obscuring the figures situated beyond. A solitary tree stands prominently on one of these rocky outcroppings, its dense foliage providing a visual anchor within the expansive scene. The artist has rendered the vegetation with considerable detail, suggesting an appreciation for naturalism while simultaneously employing it to create depth and guide the viewer’s eye into the distance.
In the middle ground, several figures are arranged around what seems to be a prone body covered by a cloth. These individuals appear distressed; their gestures suggest grief or lamentation. One figure, dressed in elaborate attire – a red coat with gold trim and a feathered hat – stands slightly apart from the others, holding a staff and gazing towards the central group. His posture conveys a sense of authority or perhaps solemn contemplation. The presence of these figures introduces a narrative element to the otherwise purely topographical scene.
The ruins themselves are rendered in considerable detail, exhibiting architectural features indicative of classical antiquity. Their dilapidated state – crumbling walls, broken arches – evokes a feeling of decay and the passage of time. A distant body of water is visible on the horizon line, adding a sense of vastness and further emphasizing the scale of the landscape.
The subtexts within this work are layered. The ruined architecture suggests a meditation on mortality and the transience of human endeavor. The figures’ emotional display implies a tragic event has occurred, hinting at themes of loss, sacrifice, or perhaps divine intervention. The combination of naturalistic detail with classical allusions creates an atmosphere that is both grounded in observation and steeped in literary or mythological reference. The solitary figure with the staff could be interpreted as a witness to this tragedy, or potentially even a participant within it, adding another layer of ambiguity to the scene’s narrative.