Albrecht Dürer – Irish Warriors and Peasants
1521. 21 x 28.2
Location: Museum of Prints and Drawings (Kupferstichkabinett), Berlin.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
On the left, a man wearing a helmet and chainmail armor stands rigidly, holding a long spear diagonally across his body. He is partially obscured by a draped cloth, which adds an element of theatricality to his presentation. The armor itself appears somewhat ill-fitting, hinting at potential limitations in resources or perhaps a symbolic representation of the burdens of authority. A bow and several arrows are positioned near him, suggesting archery as a supplementary skill or weapon.
The central figure is markedly different. He is clad in what appears to be a thick fur coat, his face partially hidden by its collar. He holds a sword at his side and is surrounded by an array of javelins, indicating a role that might involve both close combat and ranged attacks. The lavishness of the fur suggests a position of relative wealth or status, contrasting with the more utilitarian appearance of the man on the left.
To the right stands another figure, dressed in simpler clothing – a tunic over what appears to be a rough shirt. He holds an axe, his posture less formal than that of the armored warrior. His bare feet and unadorned attire suggest a lower social standing or perhaps a connection to rural life.
The figures are rendered with a degree of realism, though their expressions are somewhat impassive, contributing to a sense of formality and distance. The artist has paid close attention to details of clothing and weaponry, which allows for speculation about the cultural context and potential societal divisions being portrayed. The presence of handwritten script above each figure suggests an attempt at identification or categorization, further reinforcing the notion that these individuals are being presented as representative types rather than specific portraits.
Subtly, there’s a sense of tension within the arrangement. While the figures appear to be standing in a static pose, the variety of weapons and attire implies potential conflict or preparedness for it. The contrast between the armored warrior, the fur-clad man, and the peasant with an axe could represent a spectrum of social roles and military capabilities within a community. The overall effect is one of controlled display, perhaps intended to convey a message about power, status, and the means by which they are maintained.