Emperor Maximilian I Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528)
Albrecht Dürer – Emperor Maximilian I
Edit attribution
Image taken from other album: gallerix.org/s/1560281550/N/1264886849/
Download full size: 2518×3107 px (2,8 Mb)
Painter: Albrecht Dürer
Location: Museum of Art History, Vienna (Kunsthistorisches Museum).
Album navigation:
Albrecht Dürer was born into a large family and his path to recognition was a thorny one. The artist married mainly for the notion of his social status; for a long time his income was the sale of engravings. At a mature age the artist acquired a patron, who became Maximilian I. Under his control the author worked on the Arc de Triomphe. At this period Dürer painted several pictures with the emperor.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of the painting "Portrait of Maximilian I" by Albrecht Dürer
Albrecht Dürer was born into a large family and his path to recognition was a thorny one. The artist married mainly for the notion of his social status; for a long time his income was the sale of engravings. At a mature age the artist acquired a patron, who became Maximilian I. Under his control the author worked on the Arc de Triomphe. At this period Dürer painted several pictures with the emperor. One such work is a portrait of Maximilian I.
The picture depicts the emperor. He is dressed in a luxurious mantle with a fur collar. On his head is a classic for that time hat. The haughty expression on his face attracts attention. The emperor was dissatisfied with something, it was characteristic of the ruler, he had a very complex character. Maximilian’s lips are pressed together and his eyes are half-closed. The arrogance reeked from the portrait. The emperor was pleased with Dürer’s painting.
The treasury was empty, the ruler was not always able to pay for the artist’s services on time. He even offered to relieve him of taxes, but the Senate refused the request. Then the generous patron appointed the artist a pension for life. If the portrait satisfied Maximilian, the emperor saw himself exactly as Dürer portrayed him. In his hand the patron holds a pomegranate. Since ancient times this fruit has been considered a symbol of immortality, rebirth and abundance.
Maximilian considered himself great and invincible, he believed in immortality. As ruler, he held the fruit in his hand, which bodes well for fertility and prosperity. It is the emperor who controls these processes; he is all-powerful. Part of the peel on the fruit is peeled and juicy grains are visible. This signifies the multiplicity of personality, which is a torment for Maximilian.
The pomegranate also symbolizes the union of the multitude under the patronage of the church. It was Maximilian who held all power in his hand, which Dürer depicted so accurately and realistically.
COMMENTS: 3 Ответы
Народ! Кто знает, что символизирует плод граната в руке императора?
Плод граната символизирует империю.
роман ТАМ НАПИСАНО
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s clothing contributes significantly to the overall impression. A dark, wide-brimmed hat sits atop his head, its shape suggesting a certain formality and status. He wears a layered garment – a dark tunic beneath an elaborate cloak lined with fur – indicative of wealth and power. The fur itself is rendered with considerable care, highlighting its luxurious quality.
To the left of the figure hangs a decorative shield or emblem. It features heraldic imagery: a crowned crest suspended from ribbons. This element serves as a clear marker of lineage and authority, reinforcing the subject’s position within a hierarchical structure. The inscription positioned to the right of the man is dense with text, likely providing biographical details or a declaration of his rule. Its presence suggests an intention to document and legitimize his reign.
The lighting in this painting is even, illuminating the face and clothing without creating harsh shadows. This contributes to a sense of dignity and composure. The green background serves as a stark contrast to the darker tones of the man’s attire, drawing attention to him as the central figure.
Subtly, theres an air of weariness about the subject; it isnt a youthful exuberance that is portrayed but rather a seasoned gravitas. This suggests not only power but also the burdens and responsibilities associated with holding such a position. The overall effect is one of controlled authority, tempered by the visible signs of age and experience.