Maurice Denis – Panel 4. The Vengeance of Venus, 1908, Eremitaget
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Below this elevated figure, a tableau of figures plays out on a lower plane. A woman lies prone, her body draped in fabric that hints at both vulnerability and opulence. Her face is partially obscured, contributing to a sense of anonymity or perhaps representing a generalized victimhood. An angelic figure, with outstretched wings, leans over the fallen woman, his expression ambiguous – it could be interpreted as pity, triumph, or even mockery.
Surrounding this central drama are several smaller figures: cherubic beings populate the lower tiers of the pedestal and stand on decorative columns flanking the scene. Their presence adds a layer of symbolic complexity; they seem to observe the unfolding events with an unsettling passivity, suggesting divine indifference or complicity in the depicted suffering. The background features a formal garden setting, defined by precisely trimmed hedges and glimpses of distant architecture, reinforcing the sense of a constructed, artificial environment.
The color palette is notable for its use of warm earth tones – terracotta, ochre, and muted greens – contrasted with the pale flesh tones of the figures. This creates a visual tension that contributes to the overall atmosphere of unease. The lighting appears diffused and even, eliminating strong shadows and flattening the perspective, which further enhances the theatrical quality of the scene.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of power, retribution, and perhaps the consequences of transgression. The elevated figure’s gesture suggests a judgment being passed, while the fallen woman embodies the recipient of that judgment. The cherubic figures introduce an element of moral ambiguity, questioning the nature of divine justice or the role of observers in moments of suffering. The formal garden setting implies a controlled environment where emotions and actions are carefully orchestrated, hinting at a critique of societal structures or established hierarchies. Overall, the painting evokes a sense of dramatic tension and psychological complexity, inviting contemplation on themes of morality, power dynamics, and human fallibility.