Vladimir Borovikovsky – Archangel Michael
1814–1815
Location: The State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow (Государственная Третьяковская галерея).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figure’s anatomy displays a classical influence; the musculature is subtly rendered, and the pose evokes heroic statuary. The skin tone possesses a pale, almost greenish hue, contributing to an otherworldly quality. A cascade of dark hair frames a face marked by a melancholic expression – the eyes are downcast, conveying a sense of solemnity or perhaps even weariness rather than triumphant joy.
The wings, partially visible and rendered in muted tones, extend from his back, adding to the impression of a celestial being. They appear somewhat heavy, their form not entirely symmetrical, which introduces an element of naturalism that contrasts with the idealized physique. The drapery is loose and flowing, clinging to the body in places while revealing other areas of skin. A yellow sash encircles the waist, providing a focal point for the eye and adding a touch of color amidst the predominantly dark palette.
The background is dominated by deep shadows, punctuated only by hints of swirling clouds or atmospheric disturbance at the upper edge of the canvas. This limited visibility creates an atmosphere of mystery and isolation, emphasizing the figure’s solitary presence. The darkness seems to press in on him, suggesting a confrontation with unseen forces.
Subtextually, the painting explores themes of divine power and responsibility. The sword signifies authority and judgment, while the shield represents defense and protection. However, the somber expression and the subdued color scheme temper any sense of overt celebration. Theres an underlying current of introspection or even burden – the figure does not appear to be a jubilant victor but rather one who carries a weighty duty. The overall effect is less about triumphant conquest and more about resolute endurance in the face of adversity, hinting at a complex understanding of divine intervention and its inherent cost.