На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figures occupy a space defined by rudimentary representations of vegetation – what appears to be cacti and broad-leafed plants – that rise up around them, forming a kind of enclosure. These elements aren’t rendered with botanical accuracy but rather serve as symbolic markers of the environment. The artist has employed a repetitive linework to suggest texture and volume within both the figures and the surrounding flora.
The positioning of the two individuals suggests an intimate relationship; they sit close together, their bodies partially overlapping. This proximity could indicate kinship, partnership, or shared experience. Their bare feet are prominently displayed, grounding them in the depicted space and potentially alluding to a connection with the earth or a life lived close to it.
The overall effect is one of restraint and simplicity. The lack of color and the emphasis on line contribute to a sense of detachment and introspection. Subtly, theres an implication of hardship or endurance conveyed through the figures’ posture and the starkness of their surroundings. The drawing seems less concerned with individual portraiture than it is with conveying a broader narrative about human resilience within a challenging environment. The date 1937 inscribed in the lower right corner suggests a historical context that might inform interpretations regarding social or political conditions.