На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The backdrop appears to be a stylized forest, indicated by vertical lines that suggest tree trunks. However, these lines are not depicted realistically; they are fragmented, overlapping, and imbued with an energetic quality that disrupts any sense of spatial depth. A prominent red form, resembling a flame or a distorted natural element, rises from behind the animals, drawing the eye upward and contributing to the overall feeling of dynamism.
The artist employed a limited palette, yet achieved considerable visual complexity through variations in tone and texture. The application of paint appears loose and expressive, with visible brushstrokes that contribute to the painting’s sense of immediacy. There is an intentional lack of precise detail; outlines are blurred, and forms seem to merge into one another.
Subtly, a feeling of anxiety or unease permeates the work. While the animals appear huddled together, their expressions are difficult to discern, contributing to a sense of ambiguity. The vibrant colors, rather than conveying joy, feel charged with an underlying tension. The fragmented nature of the composition and the distorted forms suggest a world in flux, perhaps reflecting themes of disruption or transformation. It is possible that the painting explores the relationship between natural forms and human perception, questioning the stability of reality through its unconventional rendering.