Part 1 Prado museum – Tiziano, Vecellio di Gregorio (Atribuido a) -- Ecce Homo
1565 1570, 100,5 cm x 100,8 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his right stands a man in elaborate attire – a high-collared garment trimmed with fur and a distinctive red hat adorned with what seems to be ecclesiastical symbols. He holds a staff, which he uses as a prop or perhaps a means of asserting authority. His posture is stiff, almost theatrical, and his expression conveys a mixture of curiosity and detached observation. The man’s gaze isnt entirely devoid of emotion, but it lacks empathy; instead, there’s an element of scrutiny, even disdain.
A third figure, partially obscured in the lower left corner, appears to be observing the scene with a more visceral reaction – a look of distress or perhaps pity is visible on his face. His presence adds another layer of complexity to the narrative, suggesting a spectrum of responses to the central figure’s suffering.
The artist employed a limited palette dominated by dark browns and blacks, punctuated by touches of red in the hat and gold in the mans garments. This restricted color scheme reinforces the painting’s melancholic mood. Light is used dramatically; it illuminates the central figure and parts of his tormentor, while leaving other areas shrouded in shadow. The window behind the suffering figure provides a glimpse of an overcast sky, further contributing to the sense of bleakness.
Beyond the immediate depiction of physical pain and humiliation, the painting seems to explore themes of power, judgment, and human response to suffering. The contrast between the vulnerable central figure and the authoritative man highlights the dynamics of oppression and submission. The inclusion of a witness – the partially visible figure – raises questions about individual responsibility and the nature of compassion. The work invites contemplation on the complexities of human interaction in moments of crisis and the enduring power of visual representation to evoke profound emotional responses.