Pavel Filonov – filonov the narva gates 1929
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 2 Ответы
* * *
В сеть сплетаемо изображенье –
Цветовая, пречУдная сеть.
За вуалью реальность. Вторженье
В суть мы знаем, как смерть…
Не могу понять
You cannot comment Why?
Above this central element rises a complex arrangement of figures and architectural fragments. A large, imposing figure with a distinctly archaic appearance sits atop what seems to be a fortified wall or platform. This individual’s features are severe, almost mask-like, and their posture conveys authority, perhaps even dominance. Surrounding them are numerous smaller figures, some seemingly engaged in ritualistic actions, others appearing as mere spectators within this elaborate tableau. The artist employed a cubist approach to form, fracturing shapes and presenting multiple viewpoints simultaneously. This technique creates a sense of dynamism and visual complexity, while also obscuring any clear narrative progression.
The color scheme is predominantly cool – blues, greens, and grays – punctuated by flashes of red and yellow that draw the eye to specific areas within the composition. The use of these colors contributes to both the painting’s emotional intensity and its symbolic depth. The dark background serves to further isolate the figures and architectural elements, enhancing their sense of monumentality.
Subtexts embedded in this work suggest a preoccupation with themes of power, history, and collective identity. The archaic figure presiding over the scene could be interpreted as representing an ancestral authority or a mythological archetype. The archway itself might symbolize a threshold – a transition between past and present, or perhaps between different realms of existence. The multitude of figures suggests a community bound together by shared traditions or beliefs, yet their individual expressions remain largely inscrutable, hinting at underlying tensions or anxieties.
The overall effect is one of profound ambiguity. While the painting evokes a sense of grandeur and historical significance, it also conveys a feeling of disorientation and unease, as if the viewer were witnessing a fragmented memory or a dreamlike vision of a bygone era.