Guercino – Return of the Prodigal Son
1627-29. 125x163
Location: Borghese gallery, Rome (Galleria Borghese).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left of the central figures, another man observes the scene with an expression that seems to be a blend of curiosity and concern. His attire suggests a position of authority or service within the household; he is dressed in finer garments than the younger man and holds what appears to be a piece of fabric – perhaps a garment or towel – in his hands.
The lighting plays a crucial role in shaping the narrative. A strong light source, seemingly emanating from an unseen window on the right side of the frame, illuminates the faces and upper bodies of the central figures, drawing attention to their emotional interaction. The rest of the scene is shrouded in shadow, creating a sense of depth and emphasizing the intimacy of the moment.
The dog positioned near the feet of the older man adds another layer of complexity. Its presence suggests loyalty and companionship, perhaps symbolizing the unconditional love offered by the father figure. It also subtly reinforces the younger man’s diminished status; he is depicted as returning not only to his family but also to a position of dependence.
The architectural setting itself contributes to the overall atmosphere. The dark, enclosed space evokes a sense of confinement and introspection, while the suggestion of a grander structure beyond hints at the wealth and privilege that have been lost – or perhaps reclaimed – by the younger man’s return.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of forgiveness, redemption, and familial reconciliation. The older mans gesture is not one of reprimand or judgment but of unconditional acceptance. The younger man’s posture conveys a sense of regret and humility, suggesting a recognition of his past mistakes. The inclusion of the observant figure introduces an element of social commentary – a silent witness to a deeply personal moment of familial grace.