Wolf Roerich N.K. (Part 1)
Roerich N.K. – Wolf
1,900. Oil on cardboard. 39.5 x 63.5 cm.
Edit attribution
Download full size: 789×497 px (0,1 Mb)
Back to album: Roerich N.K. (Part 1)
Location: The State Museum of Oriental Art, Moscow (Государственный музей искусства народов Востока).
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
Here we see several wolves in varying degrees of focus. A prominent wolf stands centrally, its posture suggesting alertness and a degree of dominance within the group. Its fur is rendered with visible brushstrokes, conveying texture and a sense of wildness. Other members of the pack are depicted less distinctly, blending into the darkness and emphasizing their collective nature. The arrangement suggests movement; they appear to be in pursuit or on patrol.
The background features a densely wooded hillside culminating in a building – likely a church or similar religious structure – with a visible dome. This architectural element introduces an intriguing juxtaposition: the untamed wilderness confronting organized faith, or perhaps civilization itself. Its distance and muted lighting imply isolation and a sense of detachment from the natural world below.
The terrain is rendered with broad strokes, creating a feeling of vastness and ruggedness. The lack of detail in the background contributes to the painting’s dreamlike quality, blurring the line between reality and symbolism.
Subtexts within this work seem to revolve around themes of instinct versus civilization, natures power against human constructs, and perhaps even societal anxieties about untamed forces. The wolves, as symbols of primal instincts and wildness, are positioned in opposition to the building, which represents order and established belief systems. This visual tension invites contemplation on humanity’s relationship with both its natural heritage and its constructed social structures. The subdued lighting and monochromatic palette reinforce a sense of introspection and quiet unease, suggesting that these themes are not presented as straightforward conflicts but rather as complex and intertwined aspects of the human experience.