Roerich N.K. – Duel
1902. Pastel on cardboard. 46.5 x 69 cm.
Location: State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg (Государственный Русский Музей).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Each figure is clad in stylized armor; the left figure’s attire features a blue and white patterned surface, while the right figures shows a red and white design. Both are protected by large, circular shields – one rendered in earthy tones of brown and ochre, the other predominantly yellow with an intricate border pattern. The shields dominate their respective figures, visually amplifying the defensive nature of the encounter. They each hold a spear extended towards their opponent, poised for attack or defense.
The artist has employed a flattened perspective, eliminating depth and creating a sense of theatricality. The figures are depicted in profile, which reinforces the formality of the scene and suggests a ritualistic quality rather than a spontaneous clash. Their stances are rigid and symmetrical, contributing to the overall impression of controlled movement and deliberate positioning.
The color palette is restrained, relying on earth tones and muted blues. This limited range contributes to the painting’s quiet intensity and reinforces the sense of solemnity surrounding the duel. The lack of detail in the faces prevents any emotional reading, further emphasizing the symbolic nature of the encounter.
Subtextually, the work seems less concerned with a narrative depiction of violence than it is with exploring themes of honor, challenge, and perhaps even the formalized structures that govern conflict. The stylized armor and shields suggest a societal framework dictating rules of engagement. The symmetry and stillness imply a balance between opposing forces, hinting at a deeper philosophical consideration beyond mere physical confrontation. It could be interpreted as an allegory for a larger struggle – a symbolic representation of competing ideologies or personal beliefs locked in a standoff.