Goya y Lucientes, Francisco de – El aquelarre, o El Gran Cabrón Part 2 Prado Museum
Part 2 Prado Museum – Goya y Lucientes, Francisco de -- El aquelarre, o El Gran Cabrón
Edit attribution
Download full size: 2954×926 px (1,0 Mb)
Back to album: Part 2 Prado Museum
The work of the great and eminent genius was not originally a painting in the usual sense, but a mural that adorned one of the walls in the artist’s home. It was transferred to canvas almost half a century after its creation by the hand of Salvador Cubells. The masterpiece is part of the cycle of "Gloomy paintings" dedicated to dark, mystical and frightening images. And indeed the impression of the canvas is very bright.
Description of Francisco de Goya’s "Coven"
The work of the great and eminent genius was not originally a painting in the usual sense, but a mural that adorned one of the walls in the artist’s home. It was transferred to canvas almost half a century after its creation by the hand of Salvador Cubells.
The masterpiece is part of the cycle of "Gloomy paintings" dedicated to dark, mystical and frightening images. And indeed the impression of the canvas is very bright. He can not understand and do not like it, but remain indifferent rather difficult. The work is painted with the scope - 4 meters 38 cm in width and 1 meter 40 cm in height. Guests visiting the artist’s abode were sometimes discouraged and struck to the core by a series of demonic motifs.
The main and prominent image is the black goat, which undoubtedly represents the devil himself. The protagonist is endowed with human features. He is dressed in a dark robe, his eyes are turned to the crowd gathered around him, he obviously says something and gestures. This humanization makes the image even more sinister; it does not appear ephemeral, but very real. It is truly frightening, for there is nothing scarier than the enslaved human mind.
The crowd approaching the devil is nothing less than a gathering of witches, that very coven. The witches are depicted with ugly distorted faces, in bent postures of adoration and submission. Their eyes are greedily fixed on Satan; they catch every word and movement.
The canvas is painted using dark, gloomy tones. This technique achieves a heavy, oppressive, almost suffocating atmosphere. It is not surprising that society at the time could not appreciate the work on its own merits. It was unacceptable and wild.
Critics say that Goya was characterized by his use of metaphors and symbols. Connoisseurs of the history and culture of Spain at the time argue that the painting is a vivid satire on the inertness of views and the absurdity of society.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The individuals within the circle exhibit a range of expressions and postures, from apparent absorption to vacant stares, hinting at varying degrees of involvement or awareness. Several figures are depicted kneeling or prostrated, while others appear to be observing with a mixture of fear and fascination. A young girl in white stands near the foreground, seemingly isolated and vulnerable amidst the throng.
The artist employed loose brushwork and dramatic chiaroscuro – the stark contrast between light and dark – to heighten the emotional intensity of the scene. The limited illumination focuses primarily on the central figure and those immediately surrounding it, leaving much of the background shrouded in shadow. This technique contributes to a feeling of mystery and disorientation.
Beyond the literal depiction of a gathering, the work seems to explore themes of superstition, societal anxieties, and the potential for collective delusion. The presence of the horned figure could be interpreted as a symbolic representation of demonic influence or perhaps a satirical commentary on religious fanaticism. The varied expressions among the participants suggest a complex interplay of belief, fear, and manipulation.
The overall effect is one of unsettling ambiguity; it leaves open questions about the nature of the event being depicted and the motivations of those involved. It’s not merely a representation of an occult ritual but rather an exploration of the darker aspects of human psychology and the power of suggestion within a community.