Part 2 Prado Museum – Balaca y Orejas-Canseco, Ricardo -- La Batalla de Almansa
1862, 142 cm x 229 cm, Lienzo, Lienzo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 2 Ответы
Баласа и Орехас-Кансеко – это все одна фамилия?
Да, Ricardo Balaca y Orejas-Canseco
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a multitude of individuals depicted: cavalry charges forward, their mounts rearing and plunging, while infantry formations struggle to maintain order. The artist has rendered uniforms in varying hues – reds, blues, whites – creating visual distinctions between opposing forces, though the overall effect is one of blurred lines amidst the tumult. A fallen figure lies prone near the viewers perspective, a stark reminder of the human cost of warfare.
The color palette leans towards earthy tones – ochres, browns, and muted greens – which contribute to the atmosphere of grim realism. The sky above is overcast, lending a somber quality to the scene. Light falls unevenly across the landscape, highlighting certain areas while leaving others in shadow, further emphasizing the drama unfolding.
Beyond the immediate violence, the painting suggests broader themes of power and control. The presence of officers on horseback, positioned slightly apart from the main melee, implies a hierarchical structure within the military organization. Their posture conveys authority, even amidst the surrounding disorder. The vastness of the landscape itself reinforces the sense of scale – the battle is not merely an isolated event but part of a larger historical narrative.
Subtly embedded within this depiction of conflict are elements that invite contemplation beyond the surface level. The scattered debris – discarded weapons, fallen banners – speaks to the fragility of victory and the ephemeral nature of glory. The distant mountains serve as a backdrop, suggesting both permanence and indifference in the face of human struggle. Ultimately, the work offers not just a record of military engagement but also an exploration of its psychological and emotional impact.