Part 2 Prado Museum – Goya y Lucientes, Francisco de -- La feria de Madrid
1778 1779, 258 cm x 218 cm, Lienzo, Óleo. Francisco de Goya y Lucientes
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
On the left side of the painting, a shadowed area establishes a visual anchor. Here we see a portrait hanging on the wall, its subject rendered with considerable detail and formality, contrasting sharply with the lively activity unfolding before it. Drapery hangs heavily, obscuring part of the scene and adding to the sense of depth.
The central focus is drawn towards a group of men engaged in what appears to be a playful interaction involving a donkey. One man kneels, seemingly attempting to adorn or tease the animal, while another, dressed in an elaborate yellow coat, observes with amusement. The figures are rendered with individual characteristics; their expressions and gestures contribute significantly to the overall narrative. A third gentleman, clad in red, stands slightly apart, his posture suggesting a degree of detached observation.
Beyond this central group, a throng of people extends into the background, blurring somewhat as they recede into distance. The cityscape visible through the crowd is indistinct, yet it provides context – hinting at an urban setting and contributing to the sense of scale.
The color palette is dominated by warm tones – ochres, yellows, reds – which amplify the feeling of festivity and vibrancy. However, the darker areas on the left introduce a note of contrast, preventing the scene from becoming overly saccharine. The artist’s brushwork appears loose and expressive, further enhancing the impression of a fleeting moment captured with immediacy.
Subtleties within the painting suggest deeper meanings beyond a simple depiction of a fair. The formal portrait juxtaposed against the boisterous activity might imply a commentary on social hierarchies or the contrast between formality and spontaneity. The interaction with the donkey could be interpreted as symbolic, perhaps representing folly or the absurdity of human behavior. Ultimately, the work seems to explore themes of leisure, social dynamics, and the fleeting nature of experience within a public sphere.