Part 2 Prado Museum – Goya y Lucientes, Francisco de -- La merienda
1776, 271 cm x 295 cm, Lienzo, Óleo. Francisco de Goya y Lucientes
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Foreground attention is drawn to the seated individuals, arranged on a vibrant red cloth spread upon the ground. A man in a dark jacket leans forward, seemingly engaged in conversation with another gentleman dressed in yellow breeches and a blue coat. A woman, positioned centrally, offers a drink from a glass, her gesture suggesting hospitality or shared enjoyment. The relaxed postures and casual attire of these figures convey an atmosphere of ease and informality.
Beyond the immediate group, other individuals are visible, some standing and observing, others seemingly involved in preparing food or tending to the surroundings. A woman carrying a basket moves towards the group, while another tends to a small dog that sniffs at the provisions laid out on the cloth. These secondary figures contribute to the sense of a larger community sharing in this moment of respite.
The landscape itself is rendered with a loose and expressive brushstroke. The trees are depicted as dense masses of foliage, their leaves catching the light in varying shades of green. A river or stream winds its way through the background, leading the eye towards distant hills and a faint suggestion of architecture on the horizon. The sky occupies a significant portion of the canvas, filled with billowing clouds that add to the overall sense of spaciousness and tranquility.
Subtleties within the scene hint at deeper meanings. The contrast between the vibrant colors of the clothing and the natural setting suggests a deliberate interplay between human activity and the environment. The inclusion of the dog introduces an element of domesticity and companionship, while the distant architecture might allude to societal structures or historical context beyond the immediate gathering. Theres a certain ambiguity in the expressions of the figures; they are not overtly joyful or sorrowful, but rather caught in a moment of quiet contemplation or shared experience. This lack of explicit emotional display invites viewers to project their own interpretations onto the scene and consider the complexities of human relationships within a specific social setting. The overall effect is one of understated observation, capturing a fleeting moment of rural life with both detail and nuance.