Part 2 Prado Museum – Schalcken, Godfried (Taller de) -- La traición de Judas
1665 1670, 53 cm x 45 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a scene steeped in shadow and illuminated by a single, central light source. Three figures are gathered around a small table draped with a green cloth; their faces and upper bodies are brought into focus by the flickering glow of a candle placed directly on the tabletop. The darkness that surrounds them is profound, swallowing details and creating an atmosphere of secrecy and impending doom.
The figure positioned furthest to the left appears older, his face etched with lines suggesting age and perhaps regret. He leans forward, intently observing something held in his hand – likely money, given the context of the scene. His gaze is fixed, conveying a sense of calculation or even desperation.
Adjacent to him sits a younger man, whose expression is one of anguish and vulnerability. The light catches on his beard and highlights the intensity of his eyes, which seem to plead or question. He gestures outward with his right hand, as if attempting to explain or justify something. His posture suggests discomfort and inner turmoil.
The third figure, situated closest to the viewer, is partially obscured by shadow but appears younger than the first man. He seems to be looking down, avoiding eye contact, which contributes to a feeling of guilt and complicity. A lantern sits on the floor near him, casting a small pool of light that further emphasizes the surrounding darkness.
The artist’s use of tenebrism – the dramatic contrast between light and dark – is central to the paintings impact. The limited illumination focuses attention on the faces and hands of the figures, emphasizing their emotional states and actions. This technique creates a claustrophobic atmosphere, intensifying the sense of betrayal and moral conflict.
Beyond the immediate narrative, the work explores themes of greed, deception, and sacrifice. The money held by the older figure represents material gain at the expense of anothers well-being. The younger man’s distress suggests a struggle between conscience and ambition. The overall effect is one of profound psychological tension, leaving the viewer to contemplate the complexities of human nature and the consequences of moral compromise. The arrangement of figures around the table evokes a sense of intimacy disrupted by an act of treachery.