Fritz Boehle – Reading monk
1895. 85x63
Location: Old and New National Galleries, Museum Berggruen (Alte und Neue Nationalgalerie, Museum Berggruen), Berlin.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The background reveals a distant townscape dominated by imposing Gothic architecture – a cathedral or similar structure rises above the surrounding buildings. This backdrop suggests a connection to a larger community and established religious order, yet the monk’s immediate environment is one of quiet isolation. A wooden fence partially obscures the view, reinforcing this sense of separation from the world beyond.
At the base of the composition, several rabbits are depicted in varying poses – some grazing peacefully, others alertly observing the scene. Their presence introduces an element of naturalism and a subtle contrast to the monk’s intellectual pursuits. Rabbits often carry symbolic weight, frequently associated with fertility, innocence, or even temptation depending on cultural context. Here, their inclusion might suggest a tension between spiritual devotion and earthly desires, or perhaps simply underscore the tranquility of the setting.
The artists use of color is noteworthy. The stark white of the monk’s habit contrasts sharply with the dark greens and browns of the foliage, drawing immediate attention to his figure. The crimson cloth on the table provides a focal point of warm color that complements the light illuminating the book. The overall palette contributes to a mood of contemplative stillness.
The paintings subtexts appear to revolve around themes of solitude, contemplation, and the relationship between faith and nature. The monk’s isolation suggests a deliberate withdrawal from worldly concerns in pursuit of knowledge or spiritual understanding. The rabbits introduce an element of ambiguity – are they symbols of temptation, innocence, or simply part of the natural world that coexists with human endeavor? Ultimately, the work invites reflection on the individuals place within both the religious and natural order.