Leonora Carrington – Sacramentat Minos
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the upper portion, behind a classical architectural framework reminiscent of ancient Greek temples, a circular medallion displays a pale orb, possibly representing the moon or a celestial body. Above this, a gallery-like space holds numerous small faces, rendered with an unsettling uniformity. Their gazes are directed downwards towards the action unfolding below, suggesting a silent audience observing a significant event.
The central register is dominated by two anthropomorphic figures engaged in what appears to be a ceremonial exchange. One figure, possessing avian features and adorned in flowing robes, extends a hand toward a small, blue-hued creature held within an ornate golden bowl. The second figure, characterized by a leonine head and a serpentine tail, offers something from its own hand towards the same creature. Their postures are formal and deliberate, conveying a sense of gravity and importance to the interaction. The color palette here is warm, with ochres and browns dominating, contributing to an atmosphere of antiquity and tradition.
The lowest register introduces a contrasting element: two animalistic figures – a lion and a dog – face each other across a crimson-red backdrop decorated with elaborate scrollwork. Between them lies a small, blue sphere resting on a pedestal. The color shift to red in this lower section creates visual separation from the upper registers while simultaneously introducing an element of tension or potential conflict.
The painting’s subtexts are complex and open to interpretation. The architectural setting suggests a connection to classical mythology or religious iconography, but the bizarre hybridity of the figures disrupts any straightforward reading. The exchange between the avian and leonine figures could symbolize a transfer of power, knowledge, or some other intangible substance. The silent audience in the upper register implies that this event is not merely personal but carries broader significance for an unseen community. The animalistic confrontation at the bottom introduces a note of primal instinct or potential discord, perhaps hinting at the consequences of the actions taking place above.
The use of symbolic objects – the orb, the bowl, the sphere – further enriches the work’s meaning, inviting viewers to contemplate their individual and collective significance within this strange, ritualistic tableau. The overall impression is one of a carefully constructed allegory, where every element contributes to a larger, enigmatic narrative.