Antique world maps HQ – Olaus Magnus - Carta Marina, 1539, Section B: Lappland, Finland
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a coastal region dominated by intricate topographical features – mountains are rendered as sharply defined peaks, forests appear as dense clusters of trees, and rivers meander across the terrain. Settlements are indicated by small, stylized buildings, suggesting human presence within this vast expanse. The cartographer employed a perspective that blends aerial views with ground-level detail, creating a sense of both distance and intimacy. A grid system of numbers runs along the top edge, likely intended for navigational purposes or to correlate specific locations with accompanying textual descriptions.
The most striking element is the inclusion of mythical creatures. A colossal sea serpent dominates the lower portion of the image, its sinuous form intertwined with coastal features. Several ships are depicted in the upper left corner, seemingly engaged with a large, aquatic monster – possibly a kraken or similar legendary beast. These depictions arent simply decorative; they contribute to the overall narrative and perceived character of the region. They suggest an environment both alluring and perilous, where encounters with the unknown were part of everyday life for those inhabiting these lands.
The presence of such creatures speaks to a broader subtext concerning European perceptions of northern territories during this period. These regions were often portrayed as wild, untamed frontiers populated by unfamiliar peoples and inhabited by extraordinary fauna. The inclusion of monsters served not only to entertain but also to reinforce notions of the exotic and potentially dangerous nature of these areas, justifying exploration and colonization through a lens of both scientific curiosity and fear.
The labeling system is noteworthy. Place names are rendered in Latin, reflecting the language of scholarship and diplomacy at the time. The careful placement of these labels alongside detailed depictions suggests an attempt to reconcile geographical accuracy with imaginative storytelling – a common characteristic of early cartography where knowledge was often intertwined with folklore and legend. The overall effect is that of a document attempting to define a region through a combination of observed reality, hearsay, and creative invention.