Jean Francois De Troy – Jason Swearing Eternal Affection to Medea
1742-43 oil on canvas
Location: National Gallery, London.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The woman, draped in flowing robes of gold and ochre, sits upon a low wall or ledge, her expression unreadable – a studied neutrality that complicates the narrative. Her posture suggests both acceptance and a certain detachment from the proceedings. A basket filled with fruit rests beside her, adding an element of domesticity to this otherwise formal and dramatic moment.
Above them, hovering in the upper left quadrant, is a winged figure, clearly representing Cupid or Eros. He holds aloft arrows, poised for action, yet his presence seems less celebratory than cautionary. The placement suggests that love – or perhaps its consequences – is an external force influencing their actions, not solely a product of their own volition.
To the right, partially obscured by foliage, stands a statue of a female figure, her arms raised in a gesture that could be interpreted as either blessing or warning. Her presence introduces another layer of complexity; she acts as a silent witness to the oath, potentially embodying fate or divine judgment. The darkness surrounding her reinforces this sense of ominous observation.
The overall palette is dominated by warm earth tones – golds, browns, and greens – which contribute to the scene’s richness and intensity. The use of chiaroscuro, with strong contrasts between light and shadow, heightens the dramatic effect and draws attention to the central figures.
Subtleties within the painting hint at a narrative fraught with potential betrayal or tragedy. The womans impassivity, the Cupids ambiguous role, and the looming presence of the statue all suggest that this moment of apparent devotion may be deceptive or short-lived. The oath itself, while presented as sacred, carries an undercurrent of unease – a sense that its consequences will be far-reaching and potentially devastating.