Part 3 Louvre – Hendrick van Steenwijck the younger and Cornelis van Poelenburgh -- Jesus in the house of Martha and Mary
1620, 68х105
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is structured around a central table draped with rich green fabric. Seated at this table is a figure identified as Jesus, his posture relaxed yet commanding attention. He gestures towards two women positioned before him. One kneels in supplication, her face turned downwards in apparent devotion; she holds a cloth, suggesting domestic duties momentarily suspended. The other stands opposite, her expression conveying a mixture of frustration and protest. Her hands are raised slightly, as if attempting to interject or argue a point.
The room itself is filled with objects that contribute to the overall atmosphere. A tall cabinet against the left wall displays an array of glassware and pottery, indicative of prosperity and refinement. Bookshelves laden with volumes suggest intellectual pursuits and learning. The ceiling, intricately paneled and illuminated by light filtering through windows, reinforces a sense of order and domestic comfort.
The lighting is particularly noteworthy. It enters from the large window on the left, casting strong highlights across surfaces and creating deep shadows that define form and add depth to the space. This chiaroscuro effect draws attention to the central figures and enhances the emotional intensity of their interaction. The contrast between light and shadow also serves to emphasize the spiritual dimension of the scene.
Beyond the immediate narrative depicted, the painting seems to explore themes of duty versus devotion, action versus contemplation. Martha’s kneeling posture suggests a recognition of Jesus importance, while Mary’s gesture implies a disagreement with the prioritization of domestic tasks over spiritual engagement. The artist has not presented a simple moral lesson but rather invites viewers to consider the complexities of faith and its relationship to everyday life. The inclusion of the exterior scene further complicates this dynamic, suggesting that even in moments of profound contemplation, the demands of the world persist.