Edmund Bristow – The Rat Trap
early to mid-19th century. 31×25. oil on panel
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central figure, positioned slightly off-center, is actively engaged in an action that draws immediate attention. He extends his arm towards a wooden contraption lying on the ground – a rat trap. His posture suggests both anticipation and a degree of smug satisfaction, as if he expects a predictable outcome from this device. The boy’s expression, marked by a slight smirk, reinforces this impression.
To his left, another boy stands with a black cat held in his arms. He appears to be observing the central figures actions with an air of detached amusement or perhaps complicity. A third boy sits nearby, closer to the viewer, and seems less involved in the immediate activity; he is accompanied by a small white dog that lies at his feet. The arrangement of these figures creates a dynamic interplay between them, hinting at shared experiences and a common social context.
The setting itself contributes significantly to the painting’s narrative. A weathered building with a thatched roof looms behind the boys, suggesting a rural or impoverished environment. The presence of earthenware jugs scattered on the ground further emphasizes this sense of economic hardship. Lush greenery frames the scene, providing a visual contrast to the dilapidated structures and hinting at a connection to nature.
Subtly placed details add layers of meaning. A single rose lies discarded near the rat trap, its delicate beauty incongruous with the rough surroundings and the boys’ activities. This could be interpreted as a symbol of lost innocence or fleeting moments of pleasure amidst hardship. The rat trap itself serves as a potent metaphor – perhaps representing the traps and pitfalls inherent in life, particularly for those living in poverty. It also suggests a certain ingenuity and resourcefulness in dealing with difficult circumstances.
The painting’s overall tone is one of bittersweet realism. While theres an undeniable element of childhood playfulness, it is tempered by the awareness of the boys’ social conditions and the underlying sense of vulnerability that permeates their existence. The artist has captured a moment of everyday life, imbued with both charm and melancholy.