malevich the woodcutter 1912 Kazimir Malevich (1879-1935)
Kazimir Malevich – malevich the woodcutter 1912
Edit attribution
Download full size: 771×1031 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Kazimir Malevich
A rather famous work by the talented artist Kazimir Malevich, "The Lumberjack," was created by him during the years 1912-1913. The artist preferred oil as his paints. He called this painting "Imitation of an Icon," implying by this its similarity to the Etudes of Fresco painting. However, the golden color preference was quite straightforward, crude and not particularly convincing in icon painting, so Malevich himself called this genre of paintings "labor". Malevich always had his own unique view of painting icons.
Description of Kazimir Malevich’s painting The Woodcutter
A rather famous work by the talented artist Kazimir Malevich, "The Lumberjack," was created by him during the years 1912-1913. The artist preferred oil as his paints. He called this painting "Imitation of an Icon," implying by this its similarity to the Etudes of Fresco painting.
However, the golden color preference was quite straightforward, crude and not particularly convincing in icon painting, so Malevich himself called this genre of paintings "labor".
Malevich always had his own unique view of painting icons. He classified icons as the highest level of peasant art. At the same time his opinion has its share of truth, as the icons - this is virtually the only type of images, which encountered the average person, not a single house was not left without an icon. In his works from the peasant labor series, Malevich discovered a new direction of his own style.
The image of peasants at their daily routine occupy the entire composition of the painting. Malevich simplifies all the details of the painting to a primitive childlike level. All details have a very enlarged form and deformation to give them a greater degree of expression. The range of colors is combined with the style of icon writing, and the flatness of the work is done in a corresponding form.
The very image of the rustic peasant, his everyday life, the works are exalted and occupy the center of the composition. His peasants as if made of new metallic material, assembled from individual parts and details.
However, Malevich is very specific in his work depicts the gender of the character: female or male. Rough features of the face, strong and strong torso is most often depicted in profile. At the same time, the peasant images reflect the dusky features of church icons. Also all Malevich’s characters had one thing in common - large eyes.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The color palette is dominated by warm tones – reds, oranges, yellows – interspersed with cooler blues and blacks. These colors are not used to mimic reality but rather to create a dynamic visual field. The red boots at the figure’s feet draw immediate attention, anchoring him within the composition while also contributing to the overall sense of heat and intensity.
The background is similarly fragmented, composed of overlapping shapes that suggest an environment without defining it explicitly. These forms appear almost architectural, hinting at a constructed space rather than a natural landscape. The lack of depth perception contributes to a flattened effect, emphasizing the two-dimensionality of the canvas.
Beyond the literal depiction of labor, the painting seems to explore themes of human effort and the relationship between man and his environment. The fragmentation of form could be interpreted as a representation of the disruption caused by industrialization or the alienation of the individual within modern society. The forceful posture and dynamic composition convey a sense of struggle and resilience. Theres an underlying tension between the figure’s physicality and the geometric abstraction that contains him, suggesting a complex interplay between human agency and external forces. The work doesn’t offer easy answers but rather poses questions about the nature of labor, identity, and the modern condition.