Philadelphia Museum of Art – Jozef Israëls, Dutch (active The Hague, Amsterdam, and Paris), 1824-1911 -- The Last Breath
1872. 111.8 x 176.5 cm
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left, another woman bends over the fallen person, her body angled away from direct view, yet conveying an impression of frantic activity – perhaps tending to the ailing individual. Her clothing appears simple and functional, indicative of a life lived in austerity. A small stool with scattered objects sits nearby, hinting at interrupted tasks or a hasty departure.
On the right side of the canvas, two children stand huddled together. One holds a baby, while the other clings to the first’s leg. Their expressions are somber and apprehensive; they seem acutely aware of the gravity of the situation unfolding before them. The older childs gaze is directed downwards, suggesting a mixture of fear and resignation.
The lighting in this painting is particularly significant. A single window allows a muted stream of light to enter, illuminating portions of the room while leaving much of it shrouded in darkness. This contrast emphasizes the emotional weight of the scene and creates a palpable atmosphere of melancholy. The limited palette – primarily dark browns, grays, and blacks – reinforces the overall feeling of despair and poverty.
The artist has meticulously rendered details that speak to the family’s impoverished circumstances: the worn floorboards, the sparse furnishings, the simple clothing. These elements contribute to a narrative about hardship and loss within a working-class environment. The presence of the children underscores the vulnerability of those left behind in times of crisis.
Beyond the immediate depiction of illness or death, the painting evokes broader themes of mortality, familial responsibility, and the fragility of life. It is not merely an observation of a single event but rather a poignant commentary on the human condition, particularly within the context of economic hardship and social vulnerability. The scene suggests a community bound by necessity and shared suffering, where even in moments of profound loss, the bonds of family provide solace and support.