Joseph Siffred Duplessis – Study for a Portrait of Charles-Claude de Flahaut de la Billarderie (1730-1809)
Count of...
Location: Conde Museum (Musée Condé), Chantilly.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s attire speaks volumes about his social standing. He is dressed in an elaborate coat, likely indicative of aristocratic fashion, with a waistcoat visible beneath. A decorative ribbon and medal adorn his chest, suggesting military or courtly service – symbols of honor and status. The powdered wig, a hallmark of the period, further reinforces his position within the elite circles of society.
He rests one arm on a table covered with papers, holding a pen in his hand. This detail introduces an element of intellectualism or administrative responsibility, hinting at a man engaged in matters beyond mere leisure. However, the papers themselves are not clearly legible, and the gesture seems more performative than genuinely engrossed in work. The placement of the hand on the table also creates a barrier between him and the viewer, suggesting a degree of formality and distance.
The color palette is dominated by muted tones – browns, grays, and creams – which lend an air of seriousness and restraint to the composition. There are flashes of brighter colors in the waistcoat and ribbon, but these are contained within the overall somber scheme. The brushwork appears loose and somewhat unfinished, characteristic of a study or preparatory work rather than a completed portrait. This lends a sense of immediacy and spontaneity to the image, as if capturing a fleeting moment.
Subtly, there is an undercurrent of melancholy in his expression. It’s not overt sadness, but something more complex – perhaps a weariness born from responsibility or a quiet contemplation of ones place within a rigid social hierarchy. The darkness surrounding him could be interpreted as symbolic of the burdens he carries, or the uncertainties of the era. Ultimately, the painting offers a glimpse into the life and persona of a man defined by his status, yet seemingly burdened by it.