Rijksmuseum: part 1 – Brekelenkam, Quiringh Gerritsz. van -- De muizenval, 1660
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s expression is complex: he seems amused, perhaps even gleeful, yet theres a hint of something more – a detached observation that borders on condescension. His pointing finger directs our attention towards the boy and the trap, reinforcing his role as an observer rather than a participant in any act of rescue. The boy’s face is partially obscured by the mechanism of the trap, but his expression conveys distress and vulnerability. He appears to be looking directly at the man, perhaps seeking assistance or understanding.
The mousetrap itself is rendered with meticulous detail, highlighting its intricate construction. Scattered around it are small objects – a flower, a few coins, and what appear to be crumbs – which contribute to the sense of a lived-in domestic space. These details suggest that this is not merely an isolated incident but part of everyday life.
Beyond the immediate narrative, the painting invites contemplation on themes of innocence, consequence, and social hierarchy. The boy’s predicament can be interpreted as a metaphor for youthful indiscretion or naivete leading to unforeseen trouble. The mans reaction suggests a commentary on the power dynamics within society – the adult observing the child, the privileged watching the vulnerable. The scene is not simply about catching mice; it speaks to broader issues of responsibility and the potential for both amusement and exploitation in human interactions. The careful arrangement of objects and the dramatic lighting contribute to an atmosphere that is simultaneously humorous and unsettling, prompting a deeper reflection on the complexities of human nature.