Part 2 Louvre – Adam Frans van der Meulen -- Defeat of the Spanish army near the Bruges Canal
c.1670, 50х80
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see two mounted figures in the immediate foreground who are clearly distinguished from the rest of the scene through their attire and positioning. They are dressed in elaborate, brightly colored uniforms – one in red and gold, the other in white and silver – suggesting positions of authority or nobility. Their horses are also notably well-groomed and powerful, contrasting with the general state of disrepair visible elsewhere. The figure on the right holds a banner aloft, potentially signifying allegiance or victory, though the overall context suggests this is more likely an attempt to rally flagging spirits.
The landscape itself contributes significantly to the narrative. A canal stretches into the distance, partially obscured by mist and the sheer number of figures present. This waterway seems to be a key element in the battle’s geography, possibly serving as a point of strategic importance or contributing to the Spanish armys vulnerability. The trees lining the canal create depth within the scene, while also acting as visual barriers that compartmentalize the action.
The artist employed a muted palette, dominated by browns, greens, and grays, which reinforces the somber mood of defeat. However, the bright colors of the uniforms provide focal points, drawing attention to those who appear to be leaders or observers amidst the chaos. The lighting is uneven, with areas of strong illumination contrasting sharply with deep shadows, adding a sense of drama and highlighting the disarray.
Subtly, the painting conveys more than just a depiction of military defeat. It speaks to themes of power, leadership, and the human cost of conflict. The contrast between the well-equipped leaders and the fallen soldiers underscores the disparity in their fates. The banner held aloft hints at an attempt to maintain morale or project an image of strength despite the evident loss. Ultimately, the work seems intended not merely to record a historical event but also to explore its broader implications regarding authority, resilience, and the fragility of military success.