Part 2 Louvre – Studio of François Clouet -- François Hercule de France (1554-1584), Duc d’Alençon
c.1560, 33х22
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The subject’s attire immediately signals high social standing. He wears an elaborate black velvet cap adorned with a plume of white feathers, suggesting military or courtly affiliation. A delicate, starched linen ruff frames his neck and upper chest, its intricate folds meticulously rendered. The dark doublet is embellished with complex gold embroidery, hinting at considerable wealth and access to skilled artisans. A heavy chain, likely symbolic of office or rank, rests upon his chest, further reinforcing the impression of authority.
The artist’s attention to detail is evident in the rendering of the subjects features. His skin possesses a smooth, almost porcelain-like quality, achieved through subtle gradations of light and shadow. The lips are delicately formed, and the eyes possess an intensity that belies his youth. A slight furrowing of the brow suggests intelligence and perhaps a touch of melancholy.
The dark background serves to isolate the figure, drawing attention to his face and clothing. It also creates a sense of depth and mystery, hinting at a world beyond the immediate representation. The limited color palette – primarily blacks, golds, and whites – contributes to an atmosphere of formality and solemnity.
Subtly, there is a suggestion of vulnerability within this display of power. The youthfulness of the subject, coupled with the slightly melancholic expression, implies a fragility beneath the outward presentation of strength and authority. The meticulous detail in rendering his features could be interpreted as an attempt to immortalize him, preserving his image for posterity – a common motivation for portraiture during this period. Ultimately, the work functions not merely as a likeness but as a carefully constructed statement about identity, status, and the complexities of youth within a hierarchical society.