Joshua Reynolds – 10th Earl of Pembroke (1734-1794)
1765-67 oil on canvas
Location: Collection of the Earl of Pembroke
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has rendered him in a vibrant red military coat, richly detailed with gold epaulettes and buttons, signifying rank and status. A dark silk scarf is knotted loosely at the throat, adding a touch of elegance to the otherwise martial appearance. The coat is partially opened, revealing a cream-colored waistcoat beneath, which contributes to a sense of relaxed formality. He holds his riding crop in one hand, casually draped over his shoulder; the other rests on his hip, further reinforcing an impression of ease and control. A tricorn hat lies discarded nearby, suggesting he has momentarily relinquished formal military posture.
The landscape behind him is rendered with considerable atmospheric perspective. Dark, turbulent clouds dominate the upper portion of the canvas, contrasting sharply with a hazy, indistinct view of what appears to be a battlefield or encampment in the distance. This background isnt meant for precise topographical representation; instead, it serves to evoke a sense of grandeur and potential conflict – a visual allusion to his military involvement without explicitly depicting any specific event. The subdued lighting enhances this effect, casting shadows that subtly emphasize the man’s features and adding depth to the composition.
Subtextually, the painting communicates themes of power, privilege, and military service. The vibrant red coat is a clear indicator of high social standing and military authority. The relaxed posture and confident gaze suggest not only competence but also an inherent sense of entitlement – a man accustomed to command and respect. The landscape backdrop hints at his involvement in warfare or colonial endeavors, though the ambiguity allows for a broader interpretation encompassing leadership and responsibility. Overall, the portrait aims to portray a figure who embodies both military prowess and aristocratic refinement, projecting an image of strength tempered by grace.