21enseig Jean-Antoine Watteau (1684-1721)
Jean-Antoine Watteau – 21enseig
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1270×680 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Jean-Antoine Watteau
Album navigation:
Jean Antoine Watteau was the son of a roofer who was addicted to drawing from childhood. As a young boy, with no means of livelihood, he serially copied paintings by the masters of painting. The reproductions, which today are created with digital printing, young Watteau repainted - each one separately. However, despite his endless diligence, the future artist had an extremely intractable character, and so often changed teachers and employers.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Jean Antoine Watteau’s painting "Gersen’s Shop Sign".
Jean Antoine Watteau was the son of a roofer who was addicted to drawing from childhood. As a young boy, with no means of livelihood, he serially copied paintings by the masters of painting. The reproductions, which today are created with digital printing, young Watteau repainted - each one separately. However, despite his endless diligence, the future artist had an extremely intractable character, and so often changed teachers and employers. He remained the longest apprentice with Claude Gillot, taking from his mentor a passion for depicting theatrical scenes and the lives of actors. The genre of his work was later called "Gallant Feast" - after the name of one of his paintings. Works by Watteau were extremely popular with his contemporaries.
The painting "The sign of the shop Gersen" - the last that the artist had time to draw before his death. Gersen was a friend of Jean Antoine, and the gravely ill artist lived with him for the last year of his life. Jersen had recently purchased an antique store and offered to paint a sign for his acquisition. As such, the sign wasn’t really needed; Jersen was merely trying to keep his dying friend busy with some work. But the painting succeeded; today it is considered the artist’s best work, his "swan song. Despite its large size, unusual for the artist, it was painted in just one week, with Watteau working only in the mornings. It is the only work by the artist where the action takes place in the interior, not in the background of the landscape.
The hanging was painted on two separate canvases inserted into a single frame - probably just couldn’t find a canvas of the right size. The antique store depicted by the artist is floor-to-ceiling hung with paintings. In the left corner, the servants pack an antique portrait in a box. On the right, prospective buyers are examining the merchandise. It is believed that under the guise of a simple sign, Watteau presented the history of painting as he imagined it.
You cannot comment Why?
On the left side of the painting, three figures are engaged in an apparent act of illicit exchange. A man, dressed in dark clothing and wearing a hat pulled low over his face, seems to be handing something – likely money – to a younger individual clad in lighter attire. A third figure, also male and formally attired, stands nearby, observing the transaction with what appears to be a mixture of amusement and complicity. The setting here is somewhat obscured by shadow, suggesting secrecy and concealment.
The right side depicts a gathering of individuals seemingly involved in some form of formal meeting or ceremony. A man, distinguished by his wig and elaborate attire, presides over a table laden with documents. Several other figures surround him, including women in elegant gowns and men in formal coats. Their expressions range from attentive to bored, hinting at the tediousness or superficiality of the proceedings. The lighting on this side is brighter, emphasizing the opulence of their surroundings and highlighting the details of their clothing.
The architectural setting itself contributes significantly to the painting’s meaning. The walls are lined with framed pictures, creating a sense of artificiality and suggesting that the scene takes place within a constructed environment – a stage for social performance. The tiled floor adds to the impression of formality and order, while the central archway serves as a visual link between the two disparate groups, implying a connection between their activities.
Subtleties in the figures’ gestures and expressions suggest a commentary on societal norms and power dynamics. The clandestine exchange on the left side appears to be undermining the formal proceedings taking place on the right, hinting at corruption or hypocrisy within the upper echelons of society. The presence of the dog near the group on the right adds an element of domesticity that contrasts with the formality of the scene, perhaps suggesting a critique of aristocratic detachment from everyday life.
The painting’s palette is dominated by muted earth tones – browns, grays, and creams – which contribute to its somber and critical tone. The use of chiaroscuro – the contrast between light and dark – heightens the drama and emphasizes the secretive nature of the events depicted. Overall, the work presents a nuanced critique of social conventions and power structures through a carefully constructed composition and subtle details.