Pieter Brueghel the Younger – Peasant Wedding Feast
1630. 73x104
Location: Fuji Art Museum, Tokyo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A long table dominates the central foreground, laden with earthenware dishes filled with food. Servers, distinguishable by their white aprons and distinctive attire, attend to the guests seated along both sides. Their expressions range from focused diligence to subtle amusement at the proceedings. The clothing worn by the participants is varied, suggesting a spectrum of social standing within this rural community – some are dressed in finer garments, while others wear simpler, more practical clothes.
The artist has paid close attention to detail in depicting the textures and materials present: the rough weave of fabrics, the sheen of pottery, and the weathered appearance of wooden tables all contribute to a sense of realism. The color palette is dominated by earthy tones – browns, greens, and ochres – punctuated by splashes of red and blue in the clothing.
Beyond the immediate gathering, glimpses of buildings and foliage suggest a rural setting. A small house with a thatched roof can be seen on the left side of the composition, while trees frame the scene, creating a sense of enclosure. The background is somewhat blurred, drawing attention to the central action.
Subtleties within the painting hint at deeper meanings. The presence of armed men suggests a potential for conflict or perhaps simply reflects the customary security measures taken during public events in this era. The expressions on some faces – a mixture of merriment and apprehension – suggest that the celebration is not without its underlying tensions. The abundance of food, while indicative of prosperity, could also be interpreted as a symbol of social hierarchy and access to resources.
The overall impression is one of vibrant communal life, but with an undercurrent of complexity and potential instability. It’s a snapshot of a moment in time, capturing the joys and anxieties inherent in rural existence.