Vasily Perov – Tea Party in Mytishchi, near Moscow
1862. 44×47
Location: The State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow (Государственная Третьяковская галерея).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his right, a woman with a shawl draped around her shoulders pours liquid from a clay jug into a cup, possibly for the clergyman or another unseen individual. Her gaze is directed towards a gaunt, weathered man in tattered clothing who stands before her, his hand outstretched as if asking for something. This man appears to be a beggar, his clothes patched and torn, and he holds a small, empty bowl in his hand.
Beside the beggar, a barefoot young boy, also dressed in ragged garments, looks on. He too seems to be seeking sustenance, holding a small object, perhaps a coin or a crust of bread, in his own hand. In the background, other figures in dark robes are visible, one of whom is also drinking from a cup, suggesting others are part of this gathering. A tent or makeshift shelter is set up behind them, and in the distance, we can see a few humble houses with smoke rising from their chimneys, indicating a small settlement.
The subtext of this painting is rich and likely aims to highlight themes of social disparity and charitable acts, or the lack thereof. The juxtaposition of the well-fed clergyman, enjoying his tea, with the impoverished beggar and child creates a stark contrast. The scene may be interpreted as a commentary on the indifference of some figures of authority or wealth towards the suffering of the poor, especially in the face of their own comfort. Alternatively, if the clergyman is depicted as being offered tea, it could be a moment of charity or communion between different social strata. The title Tea Party itself might carry an ironic tone, suggesting a gathering of comfort juxtaposed with hardship. The overall atmosphere, while set in a seemingly peaceful natural environment, carries a palpable tension due to the social and economic divide presented.