Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Monogrammist JVR -- Stilleven met varkenskop, varkenspootjes en worst, 1600-1650
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artists handling of light is significant; it illuminates the subjects from an unseen source, creating strong contrasts between areas of shadow and highlight. This technique emphasizes the physicality and materiality of the food items, contributing to a sense of immediacy and visceral presence. The dark background serves to isolate the objects, drawing attention solely to their form and texture.
Beyond the straightforward depiction of foodstuffs, the painting invites consideration of symbolic interpretations. Still lifes of this nature frequently carried vanitas themes – reminders of mortality and the transience of earthly pleasures. The raw state of the meat suggests a vulnerability and decay, hinting at the fleeting nature of life itself. The inclusion of the label Tis al vant Vercken (meaning “It is all from Vercken”) adds another layer of complexity; it could be interpreted as an indication of provenance or ownership, but also potentially as a commentary on the commercial aspects of food production and consumption.
The overall effect is one of both abundance and unsettling realism. The meticulous rendering of the meat, while demonstrating technical skill, simultaneously evokes a sense of discomfort in its directness. It’s likely that the work was intended to be appreciated for its artistry and naturalism, but also to prompt reflection on deeper philosophical themes related to life, death, and the human condition.