Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Eyck, Nicolaas van (I) -- Infanteriegevecht bij een brug, 1627-1679
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see soldiers arrayed on both sides of the bridge, their uniforms largely dark, punctuated by occasional white accents. The presence of flags – one predominantly white with a red cross, the other orange – indicates opposing factions engaged in conflict. A significant portion of the action centers around the bridge itself; several figures are positioned atop it, while others struggle to ascend or fall from its structure.
The artist has employed a muted palette, dominated by browns, grays, and blacks, which reinforces the grim atmosphere of war. The sky is overcast with swirling clouds, adding to the sense of foreboding and instability. Smoke billows from the center of the composition, obscuring details and creating a visual barrier between the opposing forces.
The ground is uneven and muddy, littered with fallen soldiers and debris. Several bodies lie prone on the earth, suggesting casualties have already occurred. The artist’s depiction of the terrain emphasizes the harshness and brutality of the environment in which this conflict takes place.
Beyond the immediate clash, a fortified structure looms in the background, hinting at a larger strategic context for the battle. This distant fortification suggests that the bridge is not merely a point of contention but also a vital link or obstacle within a broader military campaign. The inclusion of this element elevates the scene beyond a simple skirmish and implies a more significant struggle.
Subtly, the painting conveys an impression of futility. While the soldiers are engaged in intense combat, their actions seem almost swallowed by the vastness of the landscape and the oppressive sky. There is little sense of heroism or glory; instead, the scene evokes a feeling of relentless violence and the tragic cost of conflict. The lack of clear victors reinforces this impression, suggesting that the battle may be part of an ongoing cycle of bloodshed.